在网络著作权侵权中，网络服务提供者大多出于第三方的地位，其承担的是间接侵权责任。《侵权责任法》第36条对于网络侵权责任认定作出了规定，然而由于该规定的粗糙、落后，我国《信息网络传播权保护条例》对网络服务提供者间接侵权责任认定做出了更加全面、细致的规定，这些规则已经成为间接侵权责任认定的一般规定。尽管如此，我国现行规定尚存在主观过错认定标准模糊、“未获利”和“标示”条款缺乏实际作用等诸多不足，尚需进一步完善。%With the rapid development of network technology, the network copyright infringement has become a new topic in the field of tort law. In the network copyright infringement, the network service provider, mostly as the third party status, is responsible for the indirect infringement liability. The 36th Article of Tort Liability Law has made provisions for the identification of network tort responsibility, but these regulations are rough and backward. And the Information Network Transmission Right Protection Ordinance has made more comprehensive and detailed rules which have become the general provisions of indirect infringement liability. In spite of this, the current rules still have many shortcomings which need to be further improved. For example, the standard of subjective fault is obscure and the provisions of “no profit”and “marked”lack of actual effect.
展开▼
