对技术侦查证据的调查核实包括庭上和庭外两种方式,应当以庭上核实为原则,以庭外核实为例外.出于保护特定法益的需要,在法庭之外对技术侦查证据进行核实有其必要.现有庭外核实主要是法院的单方职权行为,行政色彩浓厚,缺少诉讼化程序构造,控辩对抗和有效质证无法落实,程序公开性和正当性难以切实保障.应当完善庭外核实的诉讼化程序,规范庭外核实程序的适用,使之顺应以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革和庭审实质化的要求.%In-court verification and out-of-court verification are the two ways to verify the evidence of technical investigation. the in-court verification should be used as usual and the out-of-court verification must be an exception. It is necessary to verify the evidence of technical investigation outside the court for the purpose of protecting specific interests. Existing out-of-court verification is primarily a court action unilaterally and strongly security administration color. Due to lacking of litigation procedure, the cross-examination between allegation and defendant cannot implement effectively, the transparency and legitimacy of the procedure is difficult to ensure. We should perfect and standardize the litigation procedure of the out-of-court verification, and make it comply with the requirements for the trial-centered reform of the criminal procedure system and the substantiation of court hearing.
展开▼