首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and information technology >Legal Evidence, Police Intelligence, Crime Analysis or Detection, Forensic Testing, and Argumentation:rnAn Overview of ComputerrnTools or Techniques
【24h】

Legal Evidence, Police Intelligence, Crime Analysis or Detection, Forensic Testing, and Argumentation:rnAn Overview of ComputerrnTools or Techniques

机译:法律证据,警察情报,犯罪分析或侦查,司法鉴定和辩论:计算机或技术概述

获取原文
           

摘要

Notwithstanding a few seminal precursors from the late 1980s, it is only with the new century that the modelling of reasoning on legal evidence has emerged as a significant area within the well-established field of AI & Law (active since the 1970s). An overview such as the one in this article has never appeared before in the literature. It is three-pronged: it is about the modelling of reasoning about legal evidence, about tools for legal argumentation, and about select areas in forensic science. For newcomers into the modelling of legal evidence by means of AI techniques, it is essential not to simplistically blunder into such design choices that would result in flaws making the tools unusable by legal professionals, so it is important to be aware of ongoing controversies. Other tools are appropriate for law enforcement, e.g., tools assisting in crime analysis. In the compass of this article, we only very briefly deal with the modelling of arguments as such,rnand we only sketchily foray into forensic science, by selecting some areas within it by way of exemplification.
机译:尽管1980年代后期有一些开创性的先驱,但只有到了新世纪,基于法律证据的推理模型才成为AI和法律界公认的重要领域(自1970年代开始活跃)。诸如本文中的概述这样的概述在文献中从未出现过。它分为三个方面:关于法律证据的推理建模,关于法律论证的工具以及关于法医学的特定领域。对于通过AI技术进入法律证据建模的新手,至关重要的是不要简单地误入此类设计选择中,以免导致法律专家无法使用该工具的缺陷,因此,重要的是要意识到不断发生的争议。其他工具也适用于执法,例如协助犯罪分析的工具。在本文的指南针中,我们仅非常简短地讨论这样的论证建模,并且我们仅通过示例性地选择其中的某些领域来粗略地涉入法证科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号