Objective To compare and evaluate the results of applying two different methods in glu-cose-6-phosphatase (G6PD) deficiency detection. Methods 3 052 blood samples were detected by Spectrophotom-eter assay and Automatic Chemistry analyzer, respectively. Results Of the 3 052 blood samples, 226 cases (7.4%) were detected with G6PD deficiency by Spectrophotometer assay, including 152 males (7.9%) and 71 females (6.3%). By Automatic Chemistry Analyzer, 287 cases (9.4%) were detected with G6PD deficiency, including 182 males (9.5%) and 105 females (9.3%). Conclusion Automatic Chemistry Analyzer and Spectrophotometer assay can both detect G6PD deficiency well, but the former is found with a higher detection rate and easy operation, which is easier to be standardized.%目的 对G6PD缺乏的不同检测方法进行比较和评价.方法 以分光光度计比色法、全自动生化分析仪速率法分别对3 052例来我院婚检和产检人群进行G6PD检测.结果 3 052例受检者中,经分光光度计比色法共检出G6PD缺乏者226例,检出率为7.4％；其中男性152例,检出率为7.9％,女性71例,检出率为6.3％.全自动生化分析仪速率法检出287例,检出率为9.4％；其中男性182例,检出率为9.5％,女性105例,检出率为9.3％.结论 全自动生化分析仪速率法测定G6PD与分光光度计比色法均能很好地检测G6PD缺乏患者,前者的检出率更高,操作便捷快速,更易标准化.
展开▼
