目的：探讨两种不同手法复位治疗向地性眼震水平半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床效果。方法选取水平半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者50例，分组进行不同手法复位治疗，短期治疗效果不佳者结合强迫长时间健侧卧位法治疗。结果初次治疗360-Barbecue 复位法组治愈率80％，Gufoni 复位法组患者治愈率72％；两组患者结合强迫长时间健侧卧位法，第二天复查治愈率分别为92％和88％，两组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论两种手法复位均能有效治疗向地性眼震水平半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕，近期疗效相近，对于无效者结合FPP可增加治愈率。%Objective To study the effects of two different manual reduction of geotropic nystagmus horizontal semi-circular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Methods 50 cases of patients with two different groups,treated with dif-ferent manual reduction. Patients with short term treatment but ineffective were treated in combination with forced prolonged lateral position FPP. Results The cure rate of initial treatment in the 360-Barbecue manual reduction groups was 80%,the Gufoni manual reduction groups was 72%. As the patients combined with FPP,the cure rate was 92%and 88%respectively in the second day treatment. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0. 05 ). Conclusion Both of the different manual reduction may effectively treat HC-BPPV. Their recent curative effect is similar. For ineffective cases may increase the cure rate combined with FPP.
展开▼
