Barratt冲动性量表中文修订版在社区和大学人群中应用的信效度

摘要

Objective: To revise the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) for use in China and assess the reliability and validity of the adapted Chinese version of the scale among community residents and college students. Methods: The adapted Chinese version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale was administered to multi-stage, stratified random samples of 603 rural residents from Shandong, 548 urban residents from Liaoning and 627 university students from Chongqing. Community respondents with a middle school education or higher were randomly assigned to either complete the instrument on their own or to have the instrument administered by an interviewer, and university students ( who all self-completed the scale) were randomly assigned to complete the instrument anonymously or to sign the instrument. Test-retest reliability was tested in 504 rural residents, 252 urban residents, and 307 university students who were re-administered the questionnaire 5 to 8 days after the first administration. Results: The internal consistency of 30 items scale and of the three 10-item subscales (assessing impulsive planning, motor impulsiveness and cognitive impulsiveness) were excellent (Cronbach' s alphas were 0. 77 - 0. 89) and the test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficients were 0. 68 -0. 89). There were no significant differences between community respondents who self-completed the scale versus those administered the scale by an interviewer, or between students who anonymously completed the scale versus those who signed the questionnaire (Ps ＞ 0. 05). There were, however, significant differences in the BIS scores among the three groups, the rural resident respondents had the lowest scores and the university student respondents had the highest scores (P ＜ 0. 05). Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the adapted Chinese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale are satisfactory, which could be used in the clinical and research work in China.%目的:检验Barratt冲动性量表(BIS-11)中文修订版在社区和大学人群中应用的信效度.方法:多阶段分层随机抽取山东农村居民603例、天津城市居民548例、重庆大学学生627例(均≥18岁),用BIS中文修订版进行调查.将具有初中或以上学历的社区受试(署名)随机分为两组:自己独立填写问卷(自评)和由调查员提问并填写问卷;大学调查均为自评,但分署名和匿名两种形式,来探索不同评估方式对问卷的影响.在初测后5-8天对完成初测的504例农村受试、252例城市受试和307例大学学生进行了重测.结果:BIS中文版包含30个条目,其总量表和3个分量表(非计划性、行动冲动性和认知冲动性)的内部一致性Cronbach α在0.77-0.89之间,重测信度ICC在0.68-0.89之间.自评或由调查员提问并填写、署名或匿名者之间BIS中文版得分差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).农村、城市和学生之间BIS中文版得分差异有统计学意义,农村受试的冲动性得分最低,学生受试的冲动性得分最高(P<0.05).结论:修订后的Barratt冲动性量表中文版的信效度良好,可以应用于国内的研究和临床工作中.