医学院校夜大学教学工作现状之专业差异分析

摘要

目的：了解夜大学教学工作现状的专业差异，为医学院校夜大学教学改革提供数据依据和参考。方法采用问卷调查与访谈对北京大学医学部夜大学学生家庭和工作对学生学习的影响、对教学工作的评价等方面进行实证研究。采用Epidata 3.1录入数据，SPSS 20.0统计软件进行卡方及非参数秩和检验。结果38.2%（63/165）的临床医学、45.8%（27/59）的检验及43.0%（71/165）的护理专业学生认为，工作给其学习带来的主要影响是“工作任务繁重，学习会使体力不支”。58.2%（96/165）的临床医学、46.5%（27/58）的检验及66.5%（105/158）的护理专业学生认为，“学习时间少”是学习过程中最大的困难。41.9%（70/167）的临床医学专业学生倾向于“完全面授”的教学方式，39.0%（23/59）的检验学生倾向于“部分面授、部分网络教学”，37.2%（68/183）的护理学生倾向于“部分面授、部分自学”。58.4%（97/166）的临床医学、55.9%（33/59）的检验及64.8%（118/182）的护理专业学生，均首选识记型及应用型两者兼有的考试题型。结论不同专业学生对夜大教学工作现状的看法趋向一致，但也存在一定差异。临床医学与护理学专业学生的特点趋于一致，满意度高；医学检验专业学生的特点突出，满意度相对不高。%Objective The paper focused on teaching status of evening college among different ma-jors, and tried to provide data support and suggestion for teaching reform of evening college in medical university. Method Using methods of questionnaires and interviews, the investigators analyzed five aspects of students in Peking University Health Science Center, which were the influences on study from family and work, and the evaluation on teaching, etc. The investigators entered data with Epidata 3.1 software and de-scribed it with SPSS 20.0 statistical software, with which they also did chi-square and nonparametric rank sum test. Results 38.2% (63/165) of clinical medicine students, 45.8% (27/59) of laboratory medical sci-ence students and 43.0%(71/165) of nursing students regarded hard work and limited energy as their major difficulty from jobs. Limited time for study was treated as the biggest problem for students of clinical medicine (58.2%, 96/165), laboratory medical science (46.5%, 27/58) and nursing (66.5%, 105/158). 41.9%(70/167) of clinical medicine students tended to receive traditional face-to-face teaching; 39.0%(23/59) of laboratory medical science students preferred partial face-to-face teaching with partial network teaching; while 37.2% (68/183) of nursing students tended to partial face-to-face teaching with partial self-study. 58.4%(97/166) of clinical medicine students, 55.9%(33/59) of laboratory medical science students and 64 . 8% ( 118/182 ) of nursing students preferred examination of both memorization and application . Conclusion Results showed that students in different majors presented similar opinions on teaching status, but also with a few dif-ferences. There were the same characteristics between students of clinical medicine and nursing, both with high satisfaction. While students in the laboratory medical science showed the special characteristics, with low satisfaction.