骨髓形态学染色联合荧光原位杂交技术在急性白血病鉴别诊断中的应用

摘要

目的 探讨联合骨髓形态学染色和荧光原位杂交(MGG-FISH)技术在Ph染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ALL)和慢性粒细胞白血病急性淋巴细胞白血病变(CML-LBC)鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值.方法 应用BCR(绿色)和ABL(橘红色)双色双融合探针,通过MGG-FISH技术对4例Ph+ALL患者、4例CML-LBC患者、1例CML急性白血病变合并淋巴瘤、1例CML急性混合细胞白血病变患者的骨髓涂片标本进行检测,依据形态学分别检测10份标本红细胞系、粒细胞系和淋巴细胞系的BCR/ABL融合信号阳性细胞百分率.结果 通过MGG-FISH方法分析,4份Ph+ALL骨髓标本红细胞系未累及,BCR/ABL融合信号阳性细胞百分率均为0%;粒细胞系阳性率分别为11%(1/9)、8%(1/12)、0%(0/8)、10%(1/10);淋巴细胞系阳性率分别为97%(76/78)、98%(87/89)、98%(97/99)、97%(75/77).4份CML-LBC骨髓标本红细胞系阳性率分别为100%(8/8)、91%(10/11)、82%(9/11)、88%(7/8);粒细胞系阳性率分别为89%(8/9)、96%(94/98)、100%(47/47)、98%(40/41);淋巴细胞系阳性率分别为96%(78/81)、93%(52/56)、96%(68/71)、95%(58/61).其余2份标本阳性率均超过80%,且通过MGG-FISH分析鉴定了恶性克隆的来源.结论 MGG-FISH技术可以准确、快速地对原发性Ph+ALL和CML-LBC进行鉴别,并可进行克隆源性分析.%Objective To evaluate the clinical application of May-Grunwald-Giemsa staining followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (MGG-FISH) technique in the differentiation diagnosis of Ph-chromosome positive acute lymphoid leukemia (Ph + ALL) from chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast crisis(CML-LBC). Methods The bone marrow smears of 4 patients with Ph+ ALL, 4 patients with CML-LBC, 1 patient with CML in myelocytic blast crisis complicated with lymphoma and 1 patient with CML in mixed blast crisis were assayed with the MGG-FISH technique in which the spectrum green labeled BCR and spectrum orange labeled ABL dual color dual fusion probes were used. Based on the morphological classification, the percentages of BCR-ABL positive cells were subsequently determined respectively in the erythroid, myeloid and lymphoid hneages for the 10 specimens. Results According to the MGG-FISH analysis, the erythroid lineage was not involved in the 4 Ph+ ALL specimens without BCR/ABL positive cells. While the BCR/ABL positive percentage of myeloid cells was 11% (1/9), 8% (1/12), 0% (0/8) and 10% (1/10) respectively and that of lymphoid cells was 97% (76/78), 98% (87/89), 98% (97/99) and 97% (75/77) respectively. On the other hand, the BCR/ABL positive percentage was 100% (8/8), 91% (10/11), 82% (9/11), 88% (7/8) in the erythroid lineage, 89% (8/9), 96% (94/98), 100% (47/47), 98% (40/41)in the myeloid lineage and 96% (78/81), 93% (52/56), 96% (68/71), 95% (58/61) in the lymphoid lineage respectively for the 4 CML-LBC specimens. The BCR/ABL positive percentages of the other 2 specimens were all above 80% and through MGG-FISH analysis we also identified the source of the malignant clones and ascertained the diagnosis of the 2 patients. Conclusions The MGG-FISH technique has proved useful in providing rapid and precise differentiation between Ph + ALL and CML-LBC. The source of the malignant clones can also be analyzed by this technique.