管理类研究生与医学研究生评判性思维能力比较的研究

摘要

目的：调查和比较分析管理类研究生与医学研究生评判性思维能力的差异，探究其课程设置、培养模式和教学方法与评判性思维能力的关系。方法采取随机抽样的方法抽取管理类研究生89名，医学研究生87名。采用中文版评判性思维能力测量表（ CTDI-CV）对两个专业176名研究生进行问卷调查。结果176名管理类研究生与医学研究生CTDI-CV总分（289．65±5．35）分，为正性水平；两个专业CTDI-CV总分皆达到正性水平，管理类研究生CTDI-CV总分（292．08±1．25），医学研究生CTDI-CV总分（287．09±4．02），两组比较差异有统计学意义（ P＝0．029）。一年级、二年级管理类研究生与医学研究生评判性思维得分分布差异有统计学意义（ P＜0．05）；三年级两个专业学生评判性思维得分分布差异无统计学意义（ P＞0．05）。结论管理类研究生与医学研究生评判性思维能力存在差异，可能与课程设置、培养模式、教学方法有关。%Objective To investigate and analyze the differences between management graduate students and medical graduate students in their critical thinking ability as well as the relationship of curriculum, training mode and teaching methods with critical thinking ability.Methods Random sampling method was adopted to select 89 graduate students of management and 87 graduate students of medicine.California Critical Thinking Scale-Chinese Version ( CTDI-CV) was used to survey the 176 students.Results The 176 students got a total CTDI-CV score of (289.65 ±5.35), which was at a positive level.The total CTDI-CV score was (292.08 ±1.25) for the management graduate students and (287.09 ±4.02) for the medical ones, with a significant difference (P<0.01).The differences in critical thinking between both groups of graduate students in grade one and grade two were significant ( P<0.05);however, the grade-three students of the two schools did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Conclusion The differences between management graduate students and medical graduate students in critical thinking ability may be related to the curriculum, training mode, and teaching methods.