“来源”的缺失——哥特建筑的“东方来源”问题学术史研究

摘要

从学术史的角度指出了哥特建筑研究从技术到精神转向之间的断裂,正是主流学者们对哥特建筑“东方来源说”的忽视导致了这一转向的中间环节的缺失.文章通过对19世纪末至二战前兴盛的“东方来源说”的细致分析,将其定位为伪装成技术问题的精神概念,为二战后的“象征性解读”提供了可参照的对象;从这一层面来说,被忽视的“东方来源说”沟通了“象征性解读”与“技术性解读”的断裂,保持了学术史的连贯性,进而得以重拾缺失的“来源”.%From the perspective of academic history,the paper points out a gap from technology to spiritual transformation in the study of Goth architecture.It is the mainstream scholars' ignorance of the "Oriental Contribution" to Gothic architecture that resulted in the lack of intermediate links in this transition.This paper aims to position it as a spiritual concept disguised as a technical issue through the analysis of "Oriental Contribution" that flourished from the end of the 19th century to World War Ⅱ,and provides reference to "symbolic interpretation"thereafter.On this level,the idea of "Oriental Contribution"reconsiders the missing origins and connects "symbolic interpretation" and "technical interpretation";maintaining the continuity of academic history.