首页> 外文学位 >Competition and Collaboration: A comparison of U.S. and Chinese Energy Outward Direct Investment.
【24h】

Competition and Collaboration: A comparison of U.S. and Chinese Energy Outward Direct Investment.

机译:竞争与合作:中美能源对外直接投资的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The U.S. and China are the world's largest energy importing countries. In 2011, both countries imported approximately half of their total oil supplies from overseas. Due to this great reliance on foreign energy supplies, energy companies from both countries continue to pursue energy outward direct investments (EODIs) as an approach to increase their access to global energy reserves. In this context, my study will compare and contrast the characteristics, current positions, and future trends of both the U.S. and Chinese EODIs--specifically their exploration and development investments. Based on the analysis of current U.S. and Chinese EODI positions, the study goes further to analyze their objectives and determinants, explaining both the similar and different aspects of EODI characteristics, positions and historical trends. By integrating the positions, objectives, and determinants of U.S. and Chinese EODIs into an interactive and dynamic mechanism, the study designs a partial equilibrium model system, in order to predict the future operational outcomes (production, sales, exploration, and profitability) and the competitive positions of U.S. and Chinese EODIs. However, the study's conclusions should be interpreted with caution, since the analysis is based on data and trends up to 2011, and in some cases up to 2008, 2009, and 2011. The major technological breakthroughs in the field, especially in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling technologies, may affect future demand, lifting costs, and geographic locations of energy reserves, and thus may affect the prospects of EODIs in significant ways.
机译:美国和中国是世界上最大的能源进口国。在2011年,两国从国外进口了大约一半的石油供应。由于对国外能源供应的高度依赖,两国的能源公司继续寻求能源对外直接投资(EODI),以此作为增加获得全球能源储备的途径。在这种背景下,我的研究将比较和对比美国和中国EODI的特征,当前位置和未来趋势-特别是其勘探和开发投资。在分析当前美国和中国EODI立场的基础上,本研究进一步分析了它们的目标和决定因素,并解释了EODI特征,立场和历史趋势的相似和不同方面。通过将美国和中国EODI的位置,目标和决定因素整合到一个互动和动态的机制中,该研究设计了部分均衡模型系统,以便预测未来的运营成果(生产,销售,勘探和盈利能力)以及美国和中国EODI的竞争地位。但是,应谨慎地解释研究的结论,因为该分析基于截至2011年的数据和趋势,在某些情况下基于截至2008年,2009年和2011年的数据和趋势。该领域的主要技术突破,尤其是在水力压裂和压裂领域。水平钻探技术可能会影响未来的需求,提升成本以及能源储藏的地理位置,因此可能会在很大程度上影响EODI的前景。

著录项

  • 作者

    Feng, Chaoling.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pardee RAND Graduate School.;

  • 授予单位 The Pardee RAND Graduate School.;
  • 学科 Public policy.;Energy.;Economics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 186 p.
  • 总页数 186
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号