首页> 外文学位 >Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform
【24h】

Teams and Organizing in the Digital Age: How Team Networks Form and Why They Perform

机译:数字时代的团队和组织:团队网络的形成方式和表现方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores the relationship between how teams form and what they need to perform. It adopts the perspective that technology is fundamental to organizing in modern workplaces and examines how technology may both enhance and constrain teamwork. By adopting this perspective, two questions naturally follow. First, how do teams organize using technologies? Second, how can technologies enable teams to organize effectively?;Addressing these two questions are of utmost importance due to two recent trends in contemporary organizations. The first trend is the rise of teams in the workplace, whereby firms are reorganizing as team-based structures to promote agility and fluidity. A 2018 Deloitte report that surveyed over 11,000 businesses found that an astounding ninety-one percent of executives ranked redesigning their organizations as a "network of teams" their number one priority (Deloitte Insights, 2018). The second trend is the rise in social media use for internal communications within the workplace. Unlike external uses of social media that cross many public platforms (e.g., Facebook for social networking, Twitter for microblogging), most organizations implement an integrated social media platform for internal communications that contains several functions (Leonardi, Huysman, & Steinfield, 2013). These platforms are collectively referred to as enterprise social media or ESM and recent reports show that two-thirds of organizations are already using ESM for their internal communications and this percentage continues to grow (Bughin, 2015). Yet despite the growing adoption of ESM, organizational scholars have been slow to study their impact on organizing and teamwork. Hence, many of the opportunities that social media offers workers remains at the potential level rather than evidence based.;These two trends not only reveal that organizations are replacing traditional hierarchical structures with flatter, team-based designs but also suggest that traditional approaches to studying work teams and technology may no longer be sufficient for understanding how teams function. Accordingly, this dissertation provides a new framework for understanding contemporary teams that specifically examines how teams naturally organize with technologies and subsequently, how technologies may enable teams to organize effectively. Towards this end, it adopts a social network approach to evaluate the structural signatures or network structures that emerge from team members' interactions.;Chapter 1 introduces the framework for investigating team properties and phenomena in this dissertation: the team form-perform paradox . This paradox refers to the disconnect between what teams do and what they ought to do to be effective. In particular, the literature on teams over the past century of research has found that teams need certain enabling conditions (Hackman, 2012) that increase the odds that they are effective. These needs include features such as diverse composition or sharing unique information. Yet the features that research has found to be most important for team performance are often disincentivized by self-formation tendencies or default team behaviors that lead to unintended consequences when people team up together. Chapter 1 proposes that the team form-perform paradox is a useful lens for synthesizing the research on teams to date and proposes that studies on teams ought to consider both the self-formation tendencies and team performance requirements in tandem, rather than as distinct entities.;Building on the team form-perform paradox framework introduced in Chapter 1, Chapters 2 through 4 explore how this lens can be used to first assess, and then improve team functioning. More specifically, Chapter 2 examines how team communication networks naturally form, and then explores how formal interventions or simple team messages can improve the effectiveness of communication in the context of online team discussions. This chapter finds that formal interventions aimed at structuring group process can be a useful way to help teams overcome some of their self-formation tendencies.;Chapters 3 and 4 then explore how the design features of modern technologies, namely enterprise social media, alter the self-formation tendencies of teams. Essentially, ESM offers teams unprecedented opportunities for organizing, and it is possible that these capabilities may facilitate new ways for teams to communicate, interact, and collaborate that can help teams overcome their form-perform paradox. To better understand the nature of these new opportunities, Chapter 3 develops a conceptual model for examining how social media use impacts teams. It proposes that the teaming environment shapes how social media affordances are enacted to alter how teams carry out team processes. Affordances refer to the potential for new actions that are offered by the features of an object, such as a technology, and provides a useful lens for examining both the positive and negative consequences of social media use on teams.;Lastly, Chapter 4 explores some of these new opportunities empirically by examining how team communication networks form on social media and how they perform. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.).
机译:本文探讨了团队如何形成与团队绩效之间的关系。它采用了技术对于现代工作场所组织至关重要的观点,并研究了技术如何增强和限制团队合作。通过采用这种观点,自然会产生两个问题。首先,团队如何利用技术进行组织?其次,技术如何使团队有效地组织起来?;由于当代组织的两个最新趋势,解决这两个问题至关重要。第一个趋势是在工作场所中团队的兴起,从而使公司重组为基于团队的结构,以促进敏捷性和流动性。德勤(Deloitte)在2018年的一份报告中对11,000多家企业进行了调查,发现惊人的91%的高管将重新设计组织作为``团队网络''列为第一要务(Deloitte Insights,2018)。第二个趋势是社交媒体在工作场所内部进行内部交流的使用率上升。与跨许多公共平台的社交媒体在外部的使用不同(例如,Facebook用于社交网络,Twitter用于微博),大多数组织为内部通信实现了集成的社交媒体平台,该平台包含多个功能(Leonardi,Huysman和Steinfield,2013)。这些平台统称为企业社交媒体或ESM,最近的报告显示,三分之二的组织已经在使用ESM进行内部通信,并且这一比例还在继续增长(Bughin,2015年)。然而,尽管ESM越来越多地被采用,但是组织学者对它们对组织和团队合作的影响的研究仍然很慢。因此,社交媒体为员工提供的许多机会仍处于潜在水平,而不是基于证据。这两个趋势不仅表明组织正在用更扁平的基于团队的设计取代传统的层次结构,而且还暗示了传统的学习方法工作团队和技术可能不再足以了解团队的运作方式。因此,本论文为理解当代团队提供了一个新的框架,该框架专门研究了团队如何自然地利用技术进行组织,以及随后的技术如何使团队有效地进行组织。为此,本文采用一种社交网络的方法来评估团队成员互动中出现的结构特征或网络结构。第一章介绍了研究团队属性和现象的框架:团队形式-表现悖论。这种悖论指的是团队做什么和应该做什么才能有效。特别是,过去一个世纪研究团队的文献发现,团队需要某些有利条件(Hackman,2012年),这些条件会增加其发挥作用的几率。这些需求包括各种组成或共享独特信息等功能。然而,研究发现对于团队绩效最重要的功能通常会因自我形成倾向或默认的团队行为而消失,这些趋势会在人们团结在一起时导致意想不到的后果。第1章认为,团队形式-绩效悖论是综合迄今为止对团队研究的有用工具,并建议对团队的研究应同时考虑自我形成倾向和团队绩效要求,而不是作为独立的实体。 ;在第1章第2章至第4章介绍的团队形式-绩效悖论框架的基础上,探索如何用这种视角来首先评估,然后改善团队功能。更具体地说,第2章研究了团队沟通网络的自然形成方式,然后探讨了在线团队讨论的背景下,正式的干预或简单的团队信息如何提高沟通的效率。本章发现,旨在构建团队流程的正式干预措施可能是帮助团队克服某些自我形成倾向的有用方法。第3章和第4章然后探讨了现代技术(即企业社交媒体)的设计功能如何改变团队的自我创造力。团队的自我形成倾向。本质上,ESM为团队提供了前所未有的组织机会,并且这些功能可能会促进团队进行交流,互动和协作的新方式,从而帮助团队克服其形形色色的悖论。为了更好地理解这些新机会的性质,第3章开发了一个概念模型,用于研究社交媒体的使用如何影响团队。它建议团队环境影响如何制定社交媒体能力以改变团队执行团队流程的方式。负担是指对象功能(例如技术)提供的新动作的潜力;最后,第4章通过考察团队沟通网络在社交媒体上的形成方式和表现,从经验上探索了其中一些新机会。 (摘要由ProQuest缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ng Lane, Jacqueline.;

  • 作者单位

    Northwestern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northwestern University.;
  • 学科 Management.;Communication.;Information technology.;Organizational behavior.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 219 p.
  • 总页数 219
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号