首页> 外文学位 >A Metaphysical Analysis of the Contemporary Brain Death Controversies.
【24h】

A Metaphysical Analysis of the Contemporary Brain Death Controversies.

机译:当代脑死亡争论的形而上学分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I survey the arguments of neurologists and bioethicists pertaining to survival. I show that these arguments are not persuasive in determining when death occurs. They do not include any rigorous analysis of what type of entity we are and are unable to clarify the properties essential for our survival. An analysis of death upon an examination of personal identity is indispensable because only on this basis will we be in a position to identity the properties which matter for our persistence across the entire span of our existence. Personal identity theories are classified into either psychological or biological accounts. This dissertation analyzes McMahan's Embodied Mind Account of Identity and Baker's Constitution Account under the psychological heading. Representative of the biological position is Olson's Animalism. McMahan's account is not persuasive in revealing the beginning and end of our lives since whether or not we acquire the capacity to create consciousness is not relevant to the presence of our persistence. Baker's notions that we begin to exist from the newborn stage and that we are persons who can persist independently of human organisms are not plausible. Besides, even if we admit Baker's assumption that there are two beings, a person and a human organism that are in a constitutive relation, we do not lose a first-person perspective and do not cease to exist in PVS. Finally, I criticize Olson's notion of the beginning and end of our lives. The primitive streak of an early fetus does not indicate the beginning of our lives. Neither does losing brain stem function determine the end of our lives. I conclude with my own conception of Animalism that we begin to exist with the onset of life processes such as metabolism within the membrane. We cease to persist as a result of the loss of the anti-entropy effect due to the irreversible cessation of life processes. When the cerebrum is detached from the body, we persist in the cerebrum so long as that organ is placed in an organic or inorganic brain stem and preserves life processes.
机译:我调查了神经学家和生物伦理学家关于生存的观点。我表明,这些论据在确定何时发生死亡方面没有说服力。他们没有对我们是哪种类型的实体进行任何严格的分析,也无法阐明对我们生存至关重要的属性。在检查个人身份时对死亡进行分析是必不可少的,因为只有在此基础上,我们才能确定对我们在整个生存过程中的持久性至关重要的特性。个人身份理论分为心理或生物学方面。本文从心理学的角度分析了麦克马汉对身份的具体化的心理理解和贝克对宪法的理解。生物学立场的代表是奥尔森的动物主义。麦克马汉的观点在揭示我们生命的开始和结束方面没有说服力,因为我们是否获得创造意识的能力与我们的毅力的存在无关。贝克认为我们从新生阶段就开始存在,而我们是能够独立于人类有机体而生存的人的观点是不合理的。此外,即使我们接受贝克的假设,即存在一个本构关系中的两个人,一个人和一个人类有机体,我们也不会失去第一人称视角并且不会在PVS中不复存在。最后,我批评奥尔森关于我们生命的开始和结束的观念。胎儿早期的原始条纹并不表示我们生命的开始。失去脑干功能也不会决定我们生命的终结。我以自己的动物主义概念得出结论,我们从生命过程的开始就开始存在,例如膜内的新陈代谢。由于生命过程的不可逆转地终止,抗熵作用的丧失使我们不再坚持下去。当大脑脱离身体时,只要器官被放置在有机或无机脑干中并保持生命过程,我们就会在大脑中持久存在。

著录项

  • 作者

    Minemura, Yuichi.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 163 p.
  • 总页数 163
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号