首页> 外文学位 >THE FRENCH STATE AND FRENCH PRIVATE INVESTMENT IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA, 1918-1938: A STUDY OF ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY
【24h】

THE FRENCH STATE AND FRENCH PRIVATE INVESTMENT IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA, 1918-1938: A STUDY OF ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY

机译:1918-1938年捷克斯洛伐克的法国国家和法国私人投资:经济外交研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the relationship between the French foreign ministry, as well as other branches of the state, and French private foreign investors during the interwar period. I chose the case of Czechoslovakia because of that state's pivotal position in French diplomacy, its relatively advanced economy and the identity of the French investors--leading banks and corporations. Sources include French and other governmental archives and documents of the French corporations most active in Czechoslovakia. I evaluate these and other materials with respect to conflicting theories on economic aspects of imperialism (Lenin and Schumpeter), C. Wright Mills' "power elite" concept and the historical background of French foreign investment before 1914.;After the First World War the Quai d'Orsay directed French capital towards opportunities in east Central Europe to reinforce alliances there. Placements in Czechoslovak heavy industry, mining and banking came early and were to be more successful than those in France's other eastern allies. The most important acquisitions were the Skoda Works and B.u.H., a coal-steel combine in the disputed Teschen region (which Poland also claimed). The Schneider group (Le Creusot-Banque de l'Union Parisienne) took control of both from Austrian hands in 1919-1920 and retained it for nearly two decades. The Munich crisis of 1938 doomed the French private investments in Czechoslovakia, some of which had been quite profitable. Although the Schneider group tried to regain its holdings in 1945, Czechoslovakia's nationalization program blocked that effort.;In connection with both Skoda and B.u.H. the Schneider group resisted the Quai d'Orsay's urgings to serve the "national interest." The French state especially valued Skoda, one of Europe's major arsenals, but its influence on the concern was limited. French banks were similarly uncooperative. Nonetheless, when investor interests were threatened, French diplomacy intervened--on occasion rather forcefully--in Prague on their behalf. Finally, despite the longstanding informal connections between the Quai d'Orsay and the private investing institutions, French economic diplomacy was effective only when their interests largely coincided. The private investors could count on the support of the French state without having to surrender any of the freedom of action they so highly prized.
机译:本文考察了两次大战之间法国外交部以及法国其他国家分支机构与法国私人外国投资者之间的关系。我之所以选择捷克斯洛伐克,是因为该国在法国外交中具有举足轻重的地位,其相对发达的经济以及法国投资者(领先的银行和公司)的身份。资料来源包括法国和其他政府档案,以及在捷克斯洛伐克最活跃的法国公司的文件。关于帝国主义的经济理论(列宁和熊彼特),C。Wright Mills的“权力精英”概念以及1914年之前法国外国投资的历史背景,我对这些材料和其他材料进行了评估。奥赛码头(Quai d'Orsay)将法国首都引向中欧东部地区加强该地区联盟的机会。在捷克斯洛伐克的重工业,采矿业和银行业的布局较早,并且比法国其他东部盟国的布局更为成功。最重要的收购是在有争议的Teschen地区(波兰也宣称拥有所有权)的煤钢联合企业Skoda Works和B.u.H.。施耐德集团(Le Creusot-Banque de l'Union Parisienne)在1919-1920年从奥地利手中控制了这两家公司,并将其保留了近二十年。 1938年的慕尼黑危机注定了法国在捷克斯洛伐克的私人投资,其中一些已经相当有利可图。尽管施耐德集团在1945年试图重新获得股份,但捷克斯洛伐克的国有化计划却阻止了这一努力。施耐德(Schneider)团体拒绝了奥赛码头(Quai d'Orsay)的敦促“​​国家利益”的主张。法国政府特别重视斯柯达,斯柯达是欧洲主要的军火库之一,但它对这一问题的影响有限。法国的银行也同样不合作。但是,当投资者利益受到威胁时,法国外交代表他们有时在布拉格进行干预(有时相当有力)。最后,尽管奥赛码头与私人投资机构之间存在着长期的非正式联系,但法国的经济外交只有在它们的利益基本吻合时才有效。私人投资者可以依靠法国政府的支持,而不必放弃他们如此珍视的任何行动自由。

著录项

  • 作者

    SEGAL, PAUL HAROLD.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 European history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 389 p.
  • 总页数 389
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号