首页> 外文学位 >Style and truth in the neoclassical art theory and criticism of Anton Raphael Mengs and Johann Winckelmann.
【24h】

Style and truth in the neoclassical art theory and criticism of Anton Raphael Mengs and Johann Winckelmann.

机译:新古典主义艺术理论中的风格和真相以及对安东·拉斐尔·蒙斯和约翰·温克尔曼的批评。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Anton Raphael Mengs has long enjoyed a greater reputation as an educator and art theorist than as a painter. Mengs' advice to young artists on the masters and precepts of the classical-minded Roman School of painting was substantially enriched by his early collaboration with Johann Winckelmann in Rome during the middle 1750s. The early Roman writings of Mengs and Winckelmann reveal a systematic effort on the part of the two friends to collect physical evidence for a superior style of art that prevailed during the cultural and political height of ancient Greek civilization. Mengs and Winckelmann made qualitative distinctions between archaic and classical Greek art and reconstructed the latter around the concept of ideal beauty, which was not previously identified with a style that actually existed.;In his own writings on art, Mengs discovered characteristics of ancient Greek art that prevailed in the paintings of High Renaissance masters like Raphael and Correggio, who succeeded the generation of Leonardo and Perugino. Raphael's nobility and simplicity of design and expression as well as Correggio's elegant line and chiaroscuro effects suggested that these painters studied the art of antiquity with great care. Mengs' Parnassus paid tribute to the higher poetic vision of the ancients and to Raphael as the modern artist who restored this vision in his selection of beautiful parts and in his creation of evolving lifelike figural expressions. Mengs' own history paintings open the event to the spectator and reveal a unity, simplicity, immediacy and refinement of figural parts and effects that underscore his admiration for the late styles of Raphael and Correggio. Mengs' belief that the ancient Greeks were superior to their modern counterparts in their methodology and knowledge of natural phenomena was shared by artists and connoisseurs who were contemporary with Mengs. Daniel Webb, Joshua Reynolds, Francesco Milizia, Benjamin West and others would similarly emphasize the comparative method, ideal beauty, a very select taste for High Renaissance masters and the moral quality of beauty in human features and in the general effects of a composition.
机译:长期以来,安东·拉斐尔·蒙斯(Anton Raphael Mengs)作为教育家和艺术理论家享有的声誉远胜于画家。 1750年代中期,他与罗马的约翰·温克尔曼(Johann Winckelmann)早期合作,极大地丰富了孟斯对年轻画家关于古典罗马画派的大师和戒律的建议。蒙斯(Mengs)和温克尔曼(Winckelmann)的早期罗马著作表明,两个朋友系统地努力收集实物证据,以证明在古希腊文明的文化和政治高度盛行的高级艺术风格。 Mengs和Winckelmann对古希腊艺术和古典希腊艺术进行了质的区分,并围绕理想美的概念重构了后者,而后者以前并未以实际存在的风格加以识别。像拉斐尔(Raphael)和科雷焦(Correggio)这样的高文艺复兴时期大师的绘画盛行,他们是莱昂纳多(Leonardo)和佩鲁吉诺(Perugino)的后代。拉斐尔(Raphael)的高贵和简洁的设计和表达方式,以及科雷焦(Correggio)的优雅线条和明暗对比效果,表明这些画家认真研究了古代艺术。孟斯的《帕纳苏斯》致敬了古代人的更高诗意的视野,并向作为现代艺术家的拉斐尔(Raphael)致敬,他选择了美丽的部分并创造了栩栩如生的人物形象表达,从而恢复了这一愿景。孟斯自己的历史画作向观众开放了这一活动,并揭示了人物形象的统一,简单,直接和精致,彰显了他对拉斐尔和科雷焦的晚期风格的钦佩。孟斯认为,古希腊人在方法论和自然现象方面的知识要优于现代希腊人,这与孟斯的当代艺术家和鉴赏家们一样。丹尼尔·韦伯(Daniel Webb),约书亚·雷诺兹(Joshua Reynolds),弗朗切斯科·米利齐亚(Francesco Milizia),本杰明·韦斯特(Benjamin West)等人将同样强调比较方法,理想美感,对高文艺复兴时期大师们的极高品味以及美感在人文特征和构图总体效果方面的道德品质。

著录项

  • 作者

    Duffy, Michael Hollowell.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Fine arts.;Art history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号