首页> 外文学位 >Assessment of the construct validity of an organizational citizenship behavior scale.
【24h】

Assessment of the construct validity of an organizational citizenship behavior scale.

机译:评估组织公民行为量表的构造效度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper concerns a construct labelled Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB). OCBs are unsolicited, cooperative gestures that employees choose to exhibit. While the OCB construct is professed as being quite promising for both research and practice, efforts to develop the construct have been lacking in consistency and reliability. This study addresses both conceptual and psychometric issues associated with OCB by investigating the most predominant measure of the construct. Also, several methodological practices in OCB research are challenged.; To test several hypotheses, ratings of OCB were collected in field settings from supervisors, coworkers, and employees. Investigated were (1) the factor structure of the Smith, et al. (1983) measure of OCB, (2) different raters' perceptions of similar factors, (3) the psychometric effect of using different raters' perceptions, and (4) the congruency of OCB items to the conceptual criteria put forth by OCB theorists.; Results did not strongly support the psychometric or conceptual stability of this OCB measure. While one stable and reliable factor was revealed (Altruism), discrepancy by raters in the hypothesized models caused concern. In addition, most participants did not perceive the items in this measure as representative of extra-role behaviors, and thus they cannot be conclusively labelled as citizenship behaviors.; Implications from the results suggest that further development of the conceptual parameters of OCB be initiated prior to developing new measures. Also, concerns as to the practicality of the OCB construct are conveyed, and recommendations for future research and conceptual development are provided.
机译:本文涉及一种标记为组织公民行为(OCB)的结构。 OCB是员工主动提出的主动提出的合作姿态。尽管OCB结构被认为在研究和实践中都很有前途,但开发该结构的努力却缺乏一致性和可靠性。这项研究通过调查最主要的构造量度,解决了与OCB相关的概念和心理计量问题。此外,OCB研究中的几种方法实践也受到挑战。为了检验几种假设,在现场环境中从主管,同事和员工那里收集了OCB评级。研究对象是(1)Smith等人的因子结构。 (1983)评估OCB,(2)不同评估者对相似因素的理解,(3)使用不同评估者感知的心理测量效果,以及(4)OCB项目与OCB理论家提出的概念标准的一致性。 ;结果并未强烈支持此OCB措施的心理或概念稳定性。尽管揭示了一个稳定可靠的因素(利他主义),但假设模型中的评分者之间的差异引起了关注。此外,大多数参与者没有将这项措施中的项目视为角色外行为的代表,因此不能将它们最终确定为公民行为。结果的含义表明,在制定新措施之前,应先进一步开发OCB的概念参数。此外,还传达了有关OCB构造实用性的担忧,并提供了有关未来研究和概念开发的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Valutis, William Ernest.;

  • 作者单位

    Ball State University.;

  • 授予单位 Ball State University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Psychology General.; Psychology Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 139 p.
  • 总页数 139
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;心理学;工业心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号