首页> 外文学位 >Mao Dun and realism: The development of literary critic.
【24h】

Mao Dun and realism: The development of literary critic.

机译:茅盾与现实主义:文学批评家的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The role Mao Dun played under the Chinese communist regime has earned him vastly different epithets--from "a liberal-minded leader of literature and art" to "a communist literary hack." This controversial issue is investigated in this study through a reassessment of the development of Mao Dun's concept of literary realism--a reassesament arrived at by examining one of Mao Dun's later theoretical works "Ye du ou ji" (Rambling notes on literature, 1958) in light of his earlier literary views.;In order to resolve this contradiction, I compared the "Notes" with Mao Dun's previous literary views. Two preliminary conclusions are drawn from this undertaking: first, Mao Dun's promotion of the formula has an implicit connection to his involvement in the series of literary polemics in modern Chinese history. Second, Mao Dun's promotion of the formula may not be a sign of his political conformity. Quite the contrary, the formula may be an indication of his political subversion.;The first conclusion results from a review of the role that realism played in modern China. Mao Dun's endeavor to establish a European-style realism in China and his involvement in the subsequent literary skirmishes against the romanticist/nonrealist school are examined in chapters one and two.;The second conclusion is arrived at by examining the historical, ideological, and literary circumstances that prompted Mao Dun to write the "Notes," which is carried out in chapters three and four.;In the "Rambling Notes on Literature" Mao Dun expresses his opinions on two current literary debates--the validity of an allegedly Soviet-coined formula "literary history is a history of realism versus anti-realism," and the polemics of socialist realism versus "realism in the socialist era." Mao Dun upholds the concept of socialist realism, which he regards as a radical departure from the nineteenth-century critical-realism. Yet, he also passionately supports the formula realism versus anti-realism, which presumes the existence of a timeless but class-defined realism. A contradiction is clearly present in Mao Dun's "dual support:" the notion of an ageless realism precludes the necessity of developing newer creative methods, including socialist realism.
机译:茅盾在中国共产主义政权下扮演的角色为他赢得了许多不同的称呼,从“一个自由派思想的文学和艺术领袖”到“一个共产主义文学家”。在本研究中,通过重新评估茅盾文学现实主义概念的发展来研究这个有争议的问题。通过重新评估茅盾后来的理论著作之一《叶杜纪》(1958年关于文学的注释)得出了重新评估的结论。为了解决这个矛盾,我将“笔记”与毛盾以前的文学观点进行了比较。从这项工作中得出两个初步结论:首先,茅盾对这一提法的推广与他对中国近代历史上一系列文学论战的介入有着隐含的联系。其次,茅盾对这一提法的提倡可能并不表示其政治上的顺从。恰恰相反,该公式可能表明他的政治颠覆。第一个结论来自对现实主义在现代中国中所扮演角色的回顾。在第一章和第二章中,对茅盾在中国建立欧式现实主义的努力及其随后针对浪漫主义者/非现实主义学校的文学小冲突的参与进行了论述;第二个结论是通过考察历史,意识形态和文学而得出的。在第三章和第四章中促使毛盾写出“笔记”的情况。;在“文学散文笔记”中,茅盾对当前的两场文学辩论表达了自己的见解。创造的公式是:“文学史是现实主义与反现实主义的历史”,以及社会主义现实主义与“社会主义时代的现实主义”的争论。毛盾坚持社会主义现实主义的概念,他认为这是与19世纪批判现实主义的根本偏离。然而,他还热情地支持现实主义与反现实主义的公式化,后者假定存在一个永恒但由阶级定义的现实主义。茅盾的“双重支持”中显然存在矛盾:永恒的现实主义的概念排除了发展包括社会主义现实主义在内的更新的创造性方法的必要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dietrich, Maicheng Shen.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Asian literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 197 p.
  • 总页数 197
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号