首页> 外文学位 >Thinking about orientals: Modernity, social science, and Asians in twentieth-century America.
【24h】

Thinking about orientals: Modernity, social science, and Asians in twentieth-century America.

机译:关于东方人的思考:现代性,社会科学和20世纪美国的亚洲人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Between 1920 and 1960, most academic research concerning Asian communities and immigrants in America was conducted within a coherent intellectual and institutional framework created by a set of researchers who had ties to the University of Chicago's Department of Sociology. Social scientists such as Robert E. Park produced a body of texts and engaged in an intellectual discussion about the 'oriental problem' in America, as they saw and defined it. At the same time, they established an institutional network which was not only interested in Chinese and Japanese Americans as objects of study, but also recruited a select few of their subjects and gave them a rare opportunity to join academia as valued experts.; Because very little research was conducted on Asian immigrants during most of the twentieth-century, the Chicago sociologists' construction of the 'oriental problem' dominated thinking about Asians in America. The 'oriental problem' had a profound effect upon definitions of race and culture in America, but it also affected the self-identities of the intellectuals who helped research the 'oriental problem.' Terms, definitions and theories which Chicago sociologists had originally formulated to understand the experiences of 'orientals' in the United States were often used by Chinese and Japanese American scholars to understand themselves and their own roles in American society. In particular, they seized the role offered to them by the sociologists as valued interpreters occupying the 'margin' between 'oriental' and 'white' Americans. The 'oriental' intellectuals used sociology as a powerful tool for analysing the difficulties which Asian immigrants had suffered in the Unite States, but they also used sociological theories as a language for expressing their own existential situations.; This dissertation examines the history of the 'oriental problem' as an intellectual and institutional framework, beginning with the Survey of Race Relations on the West Coast in 1924 and ending with its demise during the 1960's. The intellectual construction of the 'oriental problem' categorized and defined 'orientals' in America, and its legacy would continue through the rise of Asian American consciousness movements and all the way to the present day.; iv
机译:在1920年到1960年之间,大多数有关亚洲社区和美国移民的学术研究都是在一组与芝加哥大学社会学系有联系的研究人员创建的一致的思想和制度框架下进行的。罗伯特·E·帕克(Robert E. Park)等社会科学家撰写了大量文章,并就他们所见和定义的美国“东方问题”进行了理性讨论。同时,他们建立了一个机构网络,不仅对华裔和日裔美国人作为研究对象感兴趣,而且还招募了一些他们选拔的科目,并为他们提供了难得的机会成为学术界的重要专家。由于在整个20世纪的大部分时间里,对亚洲移民的研究很少,因此芝加哥社会学家对“东方问题”的建构主导了对美国亚裔的思考。 “东方问题”对美国种族和文化的定义产生了深远影响,但同时也影响了帮助研究“东方问题”的知识分子的自我认同。芝加哥社会学家最初用来理解美国“东方人”经历的术语,定义和理论经常被中美日裔学者用来理解自己和他们在美国社会中的角色。尤其是,他们抓住了社会学家赋予他们的角色,因为有价值的口译员占据了“东方”和“白人”美国人之间的“边缘”。 “东方”知识分子使用社会学作为分析亚洲移民在美国遭受的困难的有力工具,但他们也使用社会学理论作为表达自己的生存状况的语言。本论文以“知识分子和制度框架”作为研究的“东方问题”的历史,从1924年《西海岸种族关系调查》开始,到1960年代消亡结束。在美国,“东方问题”的思想建构被归类和定义为“东方”,其遗产将通过亚裔美国人意识运动的兴起一直延续到今天。 iv

著录项

  • 作者

    Yu, Henry Shuen Ngei.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 History United States.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 390 p.
  • 总页数 390
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;民族学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号