首页> 外文学位 >Effects of vividness, personal relevance, and argument strength on responses to AIDS prevention messages.
【24h】

Effects of vividness, personal relevance, and argument strength on responses to AIDS prevention messages.

机译:生动,人际关系和论据强度对艾滋病预防信息反应的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Understanding determinants of attitude change and persuasion has been a cornerstone of social psychological research. Although one might expect a vividly presented communication to be more persuasive than a similar message presented in a pallid format, previous research has not consistently supported such a view.; The present study examined one set of boundary conditions that may limit the occurrence of the vividness effect. This study hypothesized that vividly presented information impacts persuasion by increasing the strength of a message. Consistent with research showing that messages of high argument quality are only more influential under conditions of high personal relevance, it was predicted that vivid messages would be more influential than pallid messages only in the high relevance condition.; This study examined the effects of vivid information, personal relevance, and argument quality on persuasion, affect, behavioral intentions and memory for the message. College students (N = 266) read one of eight messages (2(Relevance) x 2(Vividness) x 2(Argument Quality)) advocating the use of condoms to reduce the risk of AIDS. Relevance was manipulated by varying the identity of the communicator (college student vs. drug user); vivid messages were more concrete, image-provoking, and emotionally engaging than pallid messages; and strong arguments were more convincing than weak arguments.; Consistent with the hypotheses, vivid messages were found to increase fear, risk estimates, and persuasion more than pallid messages. Personal relevance was also evaluated as a function of subjects' gender and previous sexual history. Among subjects for whom the essay was especially relevant (i.e., males and sexually active subjects), vivid essays were more persuasive than pallid ones. Among males, vivid messages, as compared to pallid messages, led to greater fear of AIDS, higher perceptions of their personal risk for AIDS, and greater desire for more information about AIDS. Among sexually active subjects, vivid essays led to greater intentions for future condom use than did pallid essays.; This is the first study to provide evidence for a model that explains contradictory findings in the vividness literature, specifically, that the effects of vividness on persuasion are largely dependent upon the relevance of the message to the recipient.
机译:理解态度改变和说服力的决定因素一直是社会心理学研究的基石。尽管人们可能期望生动呈现的交流比以苍白的形式呈现的相似讯息更具说服力,但先前的研究并未始终如一地支持这种观点。本研究检查了一组边界条件,这些边界条件可能会限制生动效果的发生。该研究假设生动地呈现信息会通过增加信息强度来影响说服力。与研究表明,只有在高度个人相关性的条件下,具有高论点质量的信息才具有更大的影响力,据预测,只有在高度相关性的条件下,生动的信息才比苍白的信息具有更大的影响力。这项研究检查了生动的信息,个人相关性和论据质量对说服力,影响,行为意图和信息记忆的影响。大学生(N = 266)宣读了八种信息(2(相关性)x 2(生动度)x 2(论据质量))之一,该信息倡导使用避孕套来降低艾滋病的风险。通过改变沟通者的身份(大学生与吸毒者)来操纵相关性。生动的信息比苍白的信息更具体,发人深省并且在情感上更具吸引力。有力的论据比有力的论据更有说服力。与假设一致的是,发现生动的信息比苍白的信息增加了恐惧,风险估计和说服力。个人相关性也根据受试者的性别和以前的性史进行了评估。在与论文特别相关的主题(即男性和性活跃的主题)中,生动的论文比苍白的论文更具说服力。在男性中,与苍白的信息相比,生动的信息导致对艾滋病的恐惧加剧,对自己的艾滋病风险有更高的认识,并渴望获得更多有关艾滋病的信息。在性活跃的受试者中,生动的论文比苍白的论文导致了将来使用避孕套的意图更大。这是第一个为解释生动性文献中矛盾发现的模型提供证据的研究,特别是生动性对说服力的影响在很大程度上取决于信息对接收者的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号