首页> 外文学位 >Alternatively certified and traditionally certified novice teachers: An evaluative comparison
【24h】

Alternatively certified and traditionally certified novice teachers: An evaluative comparison

机译:可替代的通过认证和传统认证的新手教师:评估比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine if the DeKalb County Alternative Certification Program educated novice teachers who demonstrated effective teaching behaviors commensurate with behaviors of traditionally certified novice teachers. The study was a pre-test/post-test nonequivalent control group design: A field experiment in a natural setting.;Data were collected in the fall and spring of 1996--97 and 1998--99 using the Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SCQ) and the Teacher Evaluation Scale (TES). Principals observed and rated both alternatively certified (AC) and traditionally certified (TC) novice teachers on the TES, which measures effective teaching behaviors. All of the novice teachers completed a SCQ, a self-reported questionnaire that classifies teachers' concerns into developmental stages: Self, Task, and Impact of Teaching.;The review of the literature yielded mixed results concerning the competency of AC teachers. Twenty-four studies indicated that AC teachers were as or more effective than TC teachers and 24 studies reported that TC teachers were more effective than AC teachers. Using an independent t test, this study found no statistically significant difference in the mean scores on the SCQ or the TES between the two groups of teachers. Also no correlation was found between the mean scores on the Impact subscale of the SCQ and the mean overall scores on the TES.;The study highlights the disparate results found by researchers as to the competency of AC teachers compared to TC teachers. It demonstrates the need for broader based, tighter controlled research to determine if alternative certification programs produce teachers who are as effective as those who complete traditional college of education programs.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定DeKalb县替代认证计划是否对初学者进行了教育,他们证明了有效的教学行为与传统认证初学者的行为相称。这项研究是测试前/测试后非对等对照组的设计:在自然环境中进行的田间实验;使用关注阶段调查表在1996--97和1998--99的秋季和春季收集了数据( SCQ)和教师评估量表(TES)。校长在TES上观察并评定了交替认证(AC)和传统认证(TC)的新手教师,以衡量有效的教学行为。所有新手教师都完成了SCQ,这是一份自我报告的问卷,将教师的关注分为发展阶段:自我,任务和教学影响。;文献回顾得出了有关AC教师能力的混合结果。二十四项研究表明,交流教师的能力比交流教师更好,或者有二十四项研究表明交流教师的能力比交流教师更好。使用独立的t检验,该研究发现两组教师的SCQ或TES的平均得分在统计学上没有显着差异。 SCQ的冲击子量表的平均分与TES的平均总分之间也没有发现相关性。这项研究强调了研究人员发现AC教师与TC教师的能力差异很大。它表明需要进行更广泛,更严格的控制研究,以确定替代认证计划是否能产生与完成传统教育学院计划的教师一样有效的教师。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lohmeier, Helen Potter.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Georgia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Georgia.;
  • 学科 Educational administration.
  • 学位 D.Ed.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号