首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of two nutrition education curricula: Cookshops and Food and Environment Lessons.
【24h】

A comparison of two nutrition education curricula: Cookshops and Food and Environment Lessons.

机译:两种营养教育课程的比较:炊具和食品与环境课程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Children have always learned about food from adults. What and how they learn has changed throughout the centuries. However, the experience most children have in the United States today is different than most of human history. They buy foods in supermarkets with vast numbers of highly processed, highly packaged food products that take considerable energy to produce, package and transport.;Given this, many scholars are encouraging nutrition educators to incorporate the entire food system and its negative environmental consequences into their education efforts.;This study evaluated and compared two ten-lesson, school-based nutrition education curricula in elementary school children. Both curricula based their content on a plant-based diet to promote ecological sustainability. One, the Cookshops, involved cooking and eating vegetables and whole grains in the classroom with the same recipes being offered at school lunch. The second, Food & Environment Lessons, did not have direct experience with food but used other active methods to teach the students about eating plant-based diet for personal health and ecological sustainability.;Two schools participated in the study, with classes assigned to one of four study conditions through matching: Cookshops and Food & Environment Lessons (10 classes), Cookshops only (11 classes), Food & Environment Lessons (9 classes) and Comparison (9 classes). Both schools had classes in all four conditions. Students in all groups received lunchroom modifications with the 13 targeted vegetables and whole grains being served on a rotation basis throughout the intervention period.;Results, analyzed with class as the unit of analysis, found that students who received Cookshops ate more of the targeted food at school lunch, with the results being stronger for younger students (K--3rd grade) (p .01) than older students (4th--6th grade) (p .10). Students who received Cookshops also increased their preferences for targeted foods (p .001). Behavioral intentions increased for younger students who received Cookshops (p .01). Knowledge increased in all intervention groups (p .05). Attitudes and cooking self-efficacy were not improved.;Thus, the Cookshop approach is quite effective, especially for younger students. The methods and results of this study can be used to guide future interventions aimed at increasing ecologically sustainable food choices.
机译:孩子们一直向成年人学习食物。在整个世纪以来,他们学到的东西和方式都发生了变化。但是,当今大多数儿童在美国的经历与人类大多数历史不同。他们在超市购买食品,这些食品具有大量高度加工,高度包装的食品,这些产品需要大量能量来生产,包装和运输。鉴于此,许多学者鼓励营养教育者将整个食品系统及其对环境的负面影响纳入其食物中。教育工作。该研究评估并比较了两个十节课的小学儿童校本营养教育课程。两种课程都以植物性饮食为基础,以促进生态可持续性。其中一个,即厨师商店,涉及在教室里烹饪和食用蔬菜和全谷类食品,并在学校午餐时提供相同的食谱。第二个课程是“食品与环境课程”,没有直接的食品经验,但使用其他有效方法教给学生有关食用植物性饮食以促进个人健康和生态可持续性的知识。;两所学校参加了该研究,每个班级分配了一个课程匹配的四个学习条件中:烹饪和食品与环境课程(10个课程),仅烹饪店(11个课程),食品和环境课程(9个课程)和比较(9个课程)。两所学校都在所有四个条件下上课。在整个干预期间,所有组的学生都在午餐室进行了修改,对13种目标蔬菜和全谷类进行了轮换服务;结果以班级为分析单位,发现接受Cookshops的学生吃了更多的目标食品在学校午餐时,较年轻的学生(4至-6年级)(p.10)对年轻学生(3至3年级)(p.01)的结果要强。接受炊具的学生对目标食品的偏爱也有所增加(p .001)。接受炊具店的年轻学生的行为意愿有所提高(第0.01页)。所有干预组的知识都增加(P = 0.05)。态度和烹饪自我效能未得到改善。因此,Cookshop方法非常有效,特别是对于年轻的学生。这项研究的方法和结果可用于指导旨在增加生态可持续食品选择的未来干预措施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Koch, Pamela Ann.;

  • 作者单位

    Teachers College, Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Teachers College, Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Education Health.;Education Home Economics.;Health Sciences Nutrition.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号