首页> 外文学位 >The rise of personal development training in organizations: A historical and institutional perspective on workplace training programs.
【24h】

The rise of personal development training in organizations: A historical and institutional perspective on workplace training programs.

机译:组织中个人发展培训的兴起:工作场所培训计划的历史和制度视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explains why the content of employee training has expanded in the 20th century from specific-technical training to include a wide range of personal development training programs such as leadership, creativity and career management. Given that provision of personal development training does not seem to follow an instrumental logic in the sense of technical rationality, human-capital and technology-based arguments can not adequately explain the rise of such training in organizations. Based upon the institutional perspective of organizations, I propose that the historical rise of the participatory citizenship model of organization drives the expansion of personal development training. The participatory citizenship model consists of two dimensions. One dimension is that individual employees (especially middle management) are empowered and regarded as the main source of organizational rationality rather than "adjunct of machines" or rule-followers. The second dimension is that organizations incorporate diffused demand from the state and society as corporate citizens rather than simply production/service centers. The rise of the participatory model is accompanied by the decline of the bureaucracy and community models, which emphasize training in specific-technical and human relations skills rather than personal development training.;This study demonstrates the impact of the participatory organizational model on personal development training at three levels: ideological, organizational, and cross-national. The empirical analyses explain both the historical changes and contemporary diversity in employee training. I combine qualitative and quantitative methods to test my core argument from different angles. The former involves fieldwork in one Fortune 100 company and an analysis of historical documents, and the latter includes a systematic content analysis of a major practitioner-oriented journal in personnel management, Personnel Journal , between 1928 and 1996, and statistical modeling of survey data based on national representative samples of organizations and individuals.;This study sheds light from a sociological perspective on the classic question raised by human capital theorists, "why do firms provide general training?", and at a broader level, probes into the fundamental aspects of historical organizational change. It also provides a critical bridge between the two fields of organization theory and strategic human resources management.
机译:本文解释了为什么员工培训的内容在20世纪从特殊技术培训扩展到包括领导力,创造力和职业管理等各种个人发展培训计划的原因。鉴于在技术合理性的意义上提供个人发展培训似乎没有遵循工具逻辑,因此人力资本和基于技术的论点不能充分解释这种培训在组织中的兴起。基于组织的制度视角,我认为组织的参与性公民身份模型的历史兴起推动了个人发展培训的扩展。参与式公民模型包括两个维度。一个方面是个人雇员(特别是中层管理人员)被赋予权力并被视为组织合理性的主要来源,而不是“机器的辅助者”或规则遵循者。第二个方面是组织将国家和社会的分散需求作为企业公民纳入考虑范围,而不仅仅是生产/服务中心。参与模式的兴起伴随着官僚主义和社区模式的衰落,后者强调了对特定技术和人际关系技能的培训,而不是对个人发展的培训。;本研究证明了参与式组织模型对个人发展培训的影响在三个层次上:意识形态,组织和跨国。实证分析解释了员工培训的历史变化和当代多样性。我结合定性和定量方法,从不同角度测试我的核心论点。前者涉及在一家《财富》 100强公司中的实地调查以及对历史文献的分析,后者包括对1928年至1996年之间的《人事管理》杂志中主要针对从业人员的主要期刊进行系统的内容分析,以及基于调查数据的统计模型该研究从社会学角度阐明了人力资本理论家提出的经典问题:“公司为什么提供一般培训?”,并在更广泛的层面上探讨了人力资本理论家的基本方面。历史性的组织变革。它还为组织理论和战略人力资源管理这两个领域之间的关键桥梁。

著录项

  • 作者

    Luo, Xiaowei.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.;Education Adult and Continuing.;Education History of.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Economics Labor.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 163 p.
  • 总页数 163
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号