首页> 外文学位 >Examining the cognitive and metacognitive strategies of first-grade journal writers in a literature-based classroom.
【24h】

Examining the cognitive and metacognitive strategies of first-grade journal writers in a literature-based classroom.

机译:在基于文学的课堂中检查一年级期刊作家的认知和元认知策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the cognitive and metacognitive strategies that first graders developed during their daily journal writing in a literature-based classroom. The 17 students responded to monthly retrospective interview questionnaires that were based on their journal entries from November to May. The questionnaire was designed to identify the strategies that the writers employed in generating ideas and constructing words.; As part of their classroom assessment, the students were administered the same Morris Spelling Test, Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, and the first-grade Word Identification Test as pre- and posttests during October and May. The initial 2 and final 2 journal entries that were considered as part of the interviews were scored using the New York State Early Literacy Profile Writing Scale. Responses to the questionnaire interview were analyzed according to the metacognitive categories of declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge.; The results of this study suggested that these first-grade students were developing cognitive and metacognitive strategies when presented learning experiences that provided instruction through modeling, scaffolding, and dialoguing. Thinking, writing about past experiences, and writing about people were the cognitive strategies that first graders most frequently reported. As the complexity of their journal entries increased, their responses utilized more procedural and conditional knowledge.; In the construction of words, the results indicated that for invented spelling, students predominantly depended on sounding out words while in accomplishing the standard spelling of words, their choices of cognitive strategies were evenly distributed among their reported strategy use. Most students used their declarative knowledge to express their sounding-out strategy when constructing words while relying on their procedural knowledge in expressing their successful construction of standard spelling words.; First graders are beginning to construct an internal framework of cognitive strategies and becoming metacognitively aware of how, when, and where to utilize these strategies during the writing process. Additionally, this study has demonstrated the viability of the questionnaire as a means of collecting metacognitive data from first graders.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究一年级学生在基于文学的课堂上每天写日记时开发的认知和元认知策略。这17名学生根据11月至5月的日记条目回答了每月的回顾性访谈问卷。问卷的设计旨在确定作者在产生想法和构词方面所采用的策略。作为课堂评估的一部分,在10月和5月期间,对学生们进行了相同的Morris拼写测试,Wechsler个人成就测试和一年级单词识别测试,作为测验前后。使用《纽约州早期扫盲概况写作量表》对被认为是访谈内容的前2个和最后2个日记条目进行评分。根据陈述性,程序性和条件性知识的元认知类别,对问卷调查的回答进行了分析。这项研究的结果表明,这些一年级学生在展示通过建模,脚手架和对话提供指导的学习经历时,他们正在发展认知和元认知策略。一年级学生最常报告的思维策略是:思考,写过去的经历以及写人。随着日记条目的复杂性增加,他们的回复使用了更多的程序和条件知识。在单词的构造中,结果表明,对于发明的拼写,学生主要依靠发音来发音,而在完成单词的标准拼写时,他们选择的认知策略在报告的策略使用中平均分配。大多数学生在构造单词时都使用他们的陈述性知识来表达他们的发声策略,同时依靠过程知识来表达他们对标准拼写单词的成功构造。一年级学生开始构建认知策略的内部框架,并逐渐意识到在写作过程中如何,何时以及在何处使用这些策略。此外,这项研究证明了问卷作为从一年级学生收集元认知数据的一种方法的可行性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Short, Judith Ann.;

  • 作者单位

    Fordham University.;

  • 授予单位 Fordham University.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.; Education Elementary.; Education Educational Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;初等教育;教育心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号