首页> 外文学位 >A descriptive analysis of the uses and functions of sarcasm in the classroom discourse of higher education.
【24h】

A descriptive analysis of the uses and functions of sarcasm in the classroom discourse of higher education.

机译:对嘲讽在高等教育课堂话语中的用途和功能的描述性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to analyze the uses and functions of sarcasm in higher education classroom discourse. This study contributes to a small but growing body of research on sarcasm by offering a descriptive analysis of spontaneous, naturally occurring data and by applying ethnographic methodology to this analysis.;Previous research has studied the nonverbal behavior as well as the verbal cues associated with sarcasm. These issues have been investigated both in the fields of psychology and linguistics. Amante (1981), Attardo (2000), Haverkate (1990) and Myers-Roy (1981) have also conducted research on sarcasm within the area of pragmatics. However, little has been written about the different realizations and uptake of the use of sarcasm from a discourse analytic perspective.;Data for the study were gathered using a microethnographic approach (Erickson 1982, 1998). I videotaped eight professors (four male/four female) teaching upper level, undergraduate courses at a large university throughout one academic semester. I recorded five classes per course, conducted ethnographic interviews with all eight of the professors at the end of the semester, and conducted interviews with forty-four students, including at least one student from each class.;This study seeks to ascertain who uses sarcasm and when in the college classroom; student's reactions to the speech behavior; topics most likely to elicit sarcasm; possible linguistic patterning of sarcasm; and implications for pedagogy. I offer valuable information on the effect of this speech behavior on the dynamics of classroom interaction.;A detailed analysis shows us that sarcasm can be used as a solidarity marker and thus has the ability to build rapport between students and teachers, if used appropriately. Just where the line is drawn between hurtful and rapport-inspiring use of this speech behavior is an important thrust of the present study. The ultimate purpose of such research is to make use of these findings in educational settings in order to foster understanding of the use of this speech behavior in classroom discourse.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析讽刺在高等教育课堂话语中的用途和功能。通过提供对自然发生的自发数据的描述性分析以及将人种学方法应用于该分析,该研究为讽刺研究的发展提供了一个小型但不断发展的研究;以前的研究已经研究了非语言行为以及与讽刺相关的言语暗示。这些问题已经在心理学和语言学领域进行了研究。 Amante(1981),Attardo(2000),Haverkate(1990)和Myers-Roy(1981)也对语用学领域的讽刺进行了研究。然而,从话语分析的角度,关于讽刺的不同认识和使用的文献很少。该研究的数据是用微观人种学方法收集的(Erickson 1982,1998)。我给一所大型大学的一个学期中的八位教授(四名男性/四名女性)的录像带进行了录制,以教授一所大型大学的高等本科课程。我每门课程记录了五节课,在学期末对所有八位教授进行了人种志访谈,并对四十四名学生进行了访谈,包括每节课中至少一名学生;本研究旨在确定谁使用嘲讽在大学教室里学生对言语行为的反应;最容易引起讽刺的话题;讽刺的可能语言模式;及其对教学法的影响。我提供了有关这种言语行为对课堂互动动力的影响的有价值的信息。详细分析表明,嘲讽可以用作团结的标志,因此,如果使用得当,可以在学生和老师之间建立融洽的关系。正是在这种言语行为的伤害性和和睦相处之间划清界限的地方是本研究的重要方向。此类研究的最终目的是在教育环境中利用这些发现,以增进对在课堂话语中使用这种言语行为的理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nelms, Jodi Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.;Speech Communication.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 178 p.
  • 总页数 178
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号