首页> 外文学位 >A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities.
【24h】

A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities.

机译:对高中艺术教室的历史/法律分析和案例研究,将其作为残障学生的限制性最小的环境。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study combines the qualitative methodologies of historical/legal analysis and case study design to compare the intent of the least restrictive environment (LRE) mandate of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to its actual practice in a high school art class. The investigation examines the art classroom as a LRE with regard to such stakeholders as: (a) the learners experiencing disabilities, (b) the art teacher, and (c) the art classroom as a whole (including students with "typical" abilities). A theoretical frame including the values of equality, liberty, and efficiency guided data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the relationships and/or disparities that exist between the legal statute's intent and its actual practice.; The study demonstrates that the federal regulations, the State Plan, and the local school district operating guidelines adhere to the purposes and the letter of the LRE mandate of IDEA as it travels through its various structural levels of implementation. The case study findings, though, evidence some barriers to a truly integrative model of inclusion at the classroom level, one that provides for active participation and maximizes the student's involvement in his/her education. These barriers included the class's exercise of an inclusion-defined-as-proximity paradigm (especially regarding the student experiencing severe disabilities), along with minimal provision for collaboration between the special and art educators in developing successful inclusion strategies. The presence of these barriers precluded, at times, the active participation and involvement of all stakeholders in the art classroom community, thereby affecting the exercise of the values of equality, liberty, and efficiency in the implementation of the LRE mandate.; The study offers eight recommendations for providing a FAPE in the art classroom as a LRE, one that is aligned with the purposes and intent of IDEA. Among these are increased communication and collaboration between stakeholders, including special and art educators, parents, and instructional aides; fostering of interaction among peers; provision of student empowerment through choice-making; and increased pre-service education opportunities to work with individuals experiencing severe disabilities.
机译:这项研究结合了历史/法律分析和案例研究设计的定性方法,以比较《残疾人教育法》(IDEA)的最低限制环境(LRE)要求的意图与其在高中美术课中的实际做法。该调查针对以下利益相关者对艺术教室进行了LRE审查:(a)残障学习者,(b)艺术老师,以及(c)整个艺术教室(包括具有“典型”能力的学生) 。一个理论框架,其中包括平等,自由和效率的价值观指导数据收集,分析和解释法律法规的意图与实际实践之间存在的关系和/或差异。研究表明,联邦法规,《州计划》和当地学区的操作指南遵循IDEA的LRE任务的宗旨和宗旨,因为IDEA贯穿了各个实施结构层次。但是,案例研究的结果证明了在课堂上建立真正一体化的包容性模型的一些障碍,这种障碍提供了积极的参与并最大程度地提高了学生对他/她的教育的参与度。这些障碍包括班级采用包容性定义为“接近”范式(特别是针对经历严重残疾的学生),以及在发展成功的包容性策略方面为特殊教育者和艺术教育者之间提供最少合作的条件。这些障碍的存在有时会阻止艺术教室社区中所有利益相关者的积极参与和参与,从而影响在执行LRE任务中平等,自由和效率价值观的行使。该研究提供了八项建议,以在艺术教室中提供FAPE作为LRE,这与IDEA的目的和意图是一致的。其中包括利益相关者之间的交流与协作,包括特殊和艺术教育者,父母和教学助手;促进同伴之间的互动;通过选择提供学生权力;以及增加了与严重残疾人士合作的职前教育机会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kraft, Leah Michelle.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas Tech University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas Tech University.;
  • 学科 Education Art.; Law.; Education Special.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 363 p.
  • 总页数 363
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;特殊教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号