首页> 外文学位 >The negative halo effect of oppositional defiant behaviors on teacher ratings of ADHD: Impact of child gender.
【24h】

The negative halo effect of oppositional defiant behaviors on teacher ratings of ADHD: Impact of child gender.

机译:反对性挑衅行为对多动症教师评分的负面光环效应:儿童性别的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study explored one potential reason for differences in diagnostic rates of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between genders: teacher-based rating bias. Abikoff, Courtney and Pelham (1993) showed elementary teachers two tapes of a male child in a fourth grade classroom, then had the teachers complete ADHD and ODD rating scales. One tape depicted a normal child; another depicted a child exhibiting either ADHD or ODD behaviors. Rating comparisons from the ADHD v. ODD tapes showed biases: the ADHD tape was rated higher than the ODD tape on ADHD rating scales and lower on ODD rating scales; while the ODD tape was rated higher than the ADHD tape on ODD rating scales but equal on ADHD rating scales. It was hypothesized that ODD behaviors exerted a halo effect on ADHD ratings.; The present study replicated and extended Abikoff et. al's study with new tapes including female actresses, hypothesizing that bias existed with the male, but not the female tapes. Following the procedures of Abikoff et al., this study showed new tapes to 80, rural Midwestern teachers. Though the tapes followed Abikoff's scripts, objective behavioral rating scales found crucial differences between his tapes and the present study tapes.; ADHD v. ODD tape comparisons showed no bias. Yet, comparisons of ADHD/ODD vs. normal tape ratings showed a bidirectional bias: ADHD behaviors inflated ODD ratings, with females rated significantly higher on ODD behaviors than males, and ODD behaviors inflated ADHD ratings, with males rated significantly higher than females on ADHD behaviors.; Results indicate that teachers may not differentiate between ADHD and ODD behaviors on rating scales, and that gender of the child exhibiting disruptive behaviors influences teacher ratings. Since diagnosticians and prevalence rate studies rely upon teacher ratings, these findings imply: (a) compared to females, the male prevalence rate for ADHD may be artificially inflated by the presence of ODD behaviors; (b) compared to males, the female prevalence rate for ODD may be artificially inflated by the presence ADHD behaviors; and (c) the comorbidity rate between ADHD and ODD may be artificially inflated by teacher failure to differentiate between ADHD and ODD behaviors.
机译:这项研究探讨了性别之间的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断率差异的一个潜在原因:基于教师的评分偏差。 Abikoff,Courtney和Pelham(1993)向小学教师展示了在四年级教室里录制的两卷带一个男孩的录像带,然后让教师完成了ADHD和ODD等级量表。一卷录音带描绘了一个正常的孩子;另一个描绘了一个孩子表现出多动症或奇特的行为。 ADHD v.ODD磁带的等级比较显示出偏差:ADHD磁带在ADHD等级量表上的评级高于ODD磁带,而在ODD等级量表上的评级较低;而ODD磁带在ODD等级量表上的评级高于ADHD磁带,但在ADHD等级量表上相等。假设ODD行为对ADHD评分产生光环效应。本研究复制并扩展了Abikoff等。等人研究了包括女性女演员在内的新录像带,并假设男性录像带存在偏见,而女性录像带不存在偏见。按照Abikoff等人的程序,本研究向80名中西部农村教师展示了新的录音带。尽管录音带遵循Abikoff的手稿,但客观的行为评级量表发现他的录音带与当前研究的录音带之间存在重大差异。 ADHD诉ODD磁带比较显示无偏差。然而,ADHD / ODD与正常磁带等级的比较显示了双向偏差:ADHD行为夸张了ODD等级,女性对ODD行为的评分明显高于男性,而ODD行为夸张了ADHD等级,男性对ADHD的评分明显高于女性。行为。结果表明,教师可能无法在等级量表上区分多动症和奇异行为,表现出破坏性行为的孩子的性别会影响教师的等级。由于诊断医生和患病率研究依赖于教师的评价,因此这些发现暗示:(a)与女性相比,ADHD的男性患病率可能因ODD行为的存在而人为抬高; (b)与男性相比,女性多动症的患病率可能因存在多动症行为而人为抬高; (c)教师未能将ADHD与ODD的合并症发病率人为地夸大以区分ADHD与ODD的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号