首页> 外文学位 >Radical transitions: Shifting gender discourses in Lebanese Muslim Shi'i jurisprudence and ideology, 1960--1979 and 1990--1999.
【24h】

Radical transitions: Shifting gender discourses in Lebanese Muslim Shi'i jurisprudence and ideology, 1960--1979 and 1990--1999.

机译:激进的过渡:1960--1979年和1990--1999年,黎巴嫩穆斯林什叶派的法学和意识形态中的性别话语转移。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation deals with the transition in gender discourses in Lebanese Muslim Shi`i jurisprudence and ideology between 1960--1979 and 1990--1999. It deals specifically with the writings and oral pronouncements of four eminent Lebanese Shi'i scholars, Musa al-Sadr, Muhammad Husayn Fadl-Allah, Muhammad Mahdi Shams al-Din, and Muhammad Hasan al-Amin. These scholars began a trend of questioning aged old assumptions underlying gender rulings in legal domains such as the personal status laws, evidence and testimony laws, and employment laws that bar women from becoming judge or head of state. The debates began in the 1960s with Musa al-Sadr, who had incorporated women's issues into his broader campaign for "social justice". Al-Sadr viewed women's roles in public life as an extension of their role in the home and his debates did not adequately raise the issues to higher legal grounds due to his political engagement in the socio-political and economic grievances of the Shi' i community.;In the 1990s, however, Fadl-Allah, al-Amin, and Shams al-Din launched a serious rethinking of gender issues in Islam. The debates that ensued during that period resulted in a body of literature aiming at reconceptualizing gender ideology along gender equality principle. Yet, such theorization was couched within an alternative Islamic perspective of "humane equality". Such reconceptualization resulted in a number of changes in Islamic Shi`i jurisprudence in legal areas such as divorce laws, women's marital rights and obligations, women's right to become judge and head of state. Yet, a number of legal gender rulings remained intact such as wife-beating, child custody, and polygamy, to name a few.;The dissertation attempts to deal with questions concerning the relation between Islamic text and reality. It also addresses questions asked on the consistency of certain gender legal rulings in Islamic Shi`i law that supersede time and local.
机译:本论文涉及黎巴嫩回教什叶派法学和意识形态在1960--1979年至1990--1999年间性别话语的转变。它专门涉及四位黎巴嫩什叶派著名学者穆萨·萨德尔,穆罕默德·侯赛因·法德·阿拉,穆罕默德·马赫迪·沙姆斯·丁和穆罕默德·哈桑·阿明的著作和口头声明。这些学者开始质疑法律领域中基于性别裁决的陈旧旧假设,例如个人身分法,证据和证词法以及禁止妇女担任法官或国家元首的雇佣法。辩论始于1960年代,穆萨·萨德尔(Musa al-Sadr)将妇女问题纳入他为“社会正义”开展的广泛运动中。 Al-Sadr认为妇女在公共生活中的作用是她们在家庭中的作用的延伸,由于他在政治上参与了什叶派社区的社会政治和经济不满,因此他的辩论未将问题充分提出更高的法律依据..然而,在1990年代,法德尔·阿拉,阿明和沙姆丁对伊斯兰教中的性别问题进行了认真的反思。在此期间进行的辩论产生了一系列文献,旨在按照性别平等原则重新概念化性别意识形态。然而,这样的理论却被另类的伊斯兰“人道平等”观点所束缚。这种重新概念化导致伊斯兰什叶派法学在法律领域发生了许多变化,例如离婚法,妇女的婚姻权利和义务,妇女的成为法官和国家元首的权利。然而,许多法律上的性别裁决仍然完好无损,例如殴打妻子,抚养子女和一夫多妻制。仅此而已。;本论文试图处理有关伊斯兰文本与现实之间关系的问题。它还解决了有关伊斯兰什叶派法律中某些性别法律裁决是否能取代时间和当地性的一致性问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Berry, Moulouk A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 History Middle Eastern.;Religion General.;Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号