首页> 外文学位 >Revisiting Turkish language policy in light of the actors' norms and identity model.
【24h】

Revisiting Turkish language policy in light of the actors' norms and identity model.

机译:根据行为者的规范和身份模式重新审视土耳其语言政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes the language policy in Turkey and the political behavior of the proponents of the language reform, Kemalist modernists, as well as political behavior of the opposing groups, Turko-Islamic traditionalists. It also explores the causes of the language policy shifts in Turkey. This study focuses on the Republican era from the early 1920s to the present. Nevertheless, it also touches on the language situation before that time.; It is hoped that this work will contribute to the existing literature on language policy in general and the Turkish case in particular in two fields: methodological and contextual. Methodologically this dissertation, unlike orthodox theories of the political science that perceive the state as a rational actor, holds that elements that influence states' behavior in international and domestic areas are to an important degree cultural, and not just material. In this regard, it is argued that the Turkish language policy has been shaped through the debate among Kemalists, Islamists, and Turkists over perceptions of norms and identity, rather than the Turkish state's rational interests.; Contextually, considering the language policy shifts of the early 1980s from the Kemalist Westernism to Turko-Islamic traditionalism as a landmark evidence, it is argued that modernist efforts to transform the Turkish language have remained incomplete, and thus far from success. While acknowledging the present situation to be a catastrophe, it is suggested that the clash of norms and identities, lack of compromise, and mutual exclusion of the ‘others’ among the domestic actors, namely among Kemalist modernist purifiers and Turko-Islamic traditionalist simplifiers, have caused this catastrophic nature of the Turkish language. This contradicts the findings of most Turkish and Western scholars, who have argued that modernism had been successful in transforming Turkish society in general and its language in particular.
机译:本文分析了土耳其的语言政策和语言改革支持者的政治行为,即Kemalist现代主义者,以及对立团体Turko-伊斯兰传统主义者的政治行为。它还探讨了土耳其语言政策转变的原因。这项研究的重点是从1920年代初至今的共和党时代。然而,它也涉及到那之前的语言状况。希望这项工作能为现有的有关语言政策的文献做出贡献,尤其是在两个方面:方法论和语境方面的土耳其案例。从方法上讲,本论文不同于将国家视为理性行为者的政治学正统理论,认为影响国际和国内地区国家行为的因素在很大程度上是文化的,而不仅仅是物质的。在这方面,有人认为土耳其语言政策的形成是通过凯末尔主义者,伊斯兰主义者和土耳其主义者之间关于规范和身份观念的争论,而不是土耳其国家的合理利益的辩论而形成的。在上下文上,考虑到1980年代初期从Kemalist西方主义到Turko-伊斯兰传统主义的语言政策转变是一个具有里程碑意义的证据,有人认为,现代主义对土耳其语言的改造工作仍未完成,因此远未取得成功。在承认目前的情况是一场灾难之后,建议在国内行为者之间,即在凯马派现代主义净化者和突厥伊斯兰传统主义者之间,规范和身份的冲突,缺乏妥协以及“他人”的相互排斥,造成了土耳其语的这种灾难性性质。这与大多数土耳其和西方学者的发现相矛盾,他们认为现代主义已成功地改变了整个土耳其社会,尤其是其语言。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bingol, Yilmaz.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Language General.; Political Science General.; History Middle Eastern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 210 p.
  • 总页数 210
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;政治理论;亚洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号