首页> 外文学位 >An ethnographic study of the relevance of social desirability bias on the social power scale studies that focus on motivational stimulus in the workplace.
【24h】

An ethnographic study of the relevance of social desirability bias on the social power scale studies that focus on motivational stimulus in the workplace.

机译:一项关于社会可取性偏差与社会力量规模研究的相关性的人种学研究,该研究集中于工作场所的动机刺激。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope of study. This dissertation investigated the influence that social desirability has on the social power scale construct developed by John French and Bertram Raven in their 1959 research on social powers. It sought to clarify whether social desirability bias is a significant factor in the determination of social power influence in the supervisor/subordinate relationship. The primary research designed consisted of an ethnographic approach.; Findings and conclusions. This study addressed the relevance of Social Desirability Bias (SDB) on the social power scale studies that focus on motivational stimulus in the workplace. In 1959 when John French and Bertram Raven initially addressed the five sources of social power, their primary intent was to identify and define them so that they could be compared to the changes that these power sources produced. However, their work was later criticized because it did not consider how social desirability bias might have influenced its outcomes. Social desirability bias is present in some forms of testing. Yet, SDB does not appear to be a significant factor in social power scale surveys. This research indicates that most people are able to distinguish the need to be perceived in a socially accepted way from the obligation to be truthful in their responses on the social power scales. This finding contradicts, to some degree, the generally held belief that SDB is an eminent threat to the social power scale results; according to this research it is not. It is therefore stated here that broadening the methodology design to consider social desirability bias as a variable to the social power scale construct is not needed. It is suggested here that further emphasis needs to be placed on educating the agent responsible for administering the survey to recognize the potential signs that may heighten SDB responses and the tools that are most effective to counterbalance its probability.
机译:研究范围。本文研究了社会可取性对John French和Bertram Raven在1959年进行的社会权力研究中发展的社会权力规模建构的影响。它试图弄清社会期望偏差是否是决定上级/下属关系中社会力量影响的重要因素。设计的主要研究包括人种学方法。 发现和结论。这项研究解决了社会期望偏差(SDB)与社会权力规模研究的相关性,该研究侧重于工作场所的动机刺激。 1959年,约翰·弗朗西斯(John French)和贝特拉姆·拉文(Bertram Raven)最初谈到了社会力量的五个来源时,它们的主要目的是识别和定义它们,以便将它们与这些力量所产生的变化进行比较。但是,他们的工作后来遭到批评,因为它没有考虑社会可取性偏见可能如何影响其结果。在某些形式的测试中存在社会期望偏差。然而,深发展似乎并不是社会力量规模调查的重要因素。这项研究表明,大多数人能够以社会认可的方式区分需要被感知的需要和对他们在社会力量等级上的真实反应的义务。这一发现在一定程度上与普遍认为的SDB是对社会权力规模结果的重大威胁相抵触。根据这项研究,事实并非如此。因此,在此指出,不需要扩大方法设计以将社会期望偏差视为社会力量规模构建的变量。建议在此进一步强调需要对负责调查管理的代理商进行教育,以认识到可能加剧SDB响应的潜在迹象以及最有效地抵消其可能性的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smith, Arthur Lee, II.;

  • 作者单位

    Northcentral University.;

  • 授予单位 Northcentral University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Psychology Behavioral.; Psychology Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 86 p.
  • 总页数 86
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;心理学;工业心理学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号