首页> 外文学位 >Stakeholders' perceptions of the importance of information literacy competencies within undergraduate education.
【24h】

Stakeholders' perceptions of the importance of information literacy competencies within undergraduate education.

机译:利益相关者对本科教育中信息素养能力的重要性的认识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The problem. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent that undergraduate students, faculty, and administrators perceive information literacy competencies are important and if these skills are being taught/learned. An underlying purpose of this study was to create an awareness of these skills for these stakeholders.; Method. A volunteer sample of stakeholders at “Private University” completed a self-designed questionnaire and interview. “Performance Indicators” and “Outcomes” in Standard Two of the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000) were addressed. To control content validity, eight information literacy experts provided input in designing the instruments.; Survey questions focused on specific skills. Open-ended interview questions invited stakeholders to express their opinions. Clustered bar graphs and tables displayed percentages of responses. The researcher post-coded questionnaire comments and interview responses into categories. To apply the results in a practical way, the responses were compared with “Stages of Concern” described in the organizational change theory entitled Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM).; Results. Responses were collected from 141/428 undergraduates and 24/71 faculty/administrators. Participants overwhelmingly agreed that these skills are important. Many faculty/administrators perceived students have learned these skills from librarians/faculty but many students responded they had not learned these skills or they were self-taught.; Ten findings emerged: (1) students' first choice for research was the Internet/WWW; (2) no formal plan existed to teach these skills at “Private University;” (3) stakeholder groups' perceptions differed regarding technology; (4) confusion existed between understanding the meaning of information literacy and computer literacy; (5) librarians were an untapped resource; (6) students lacked knowledge about performing effective online searches; (7) many faculty did not assess students' references; (8) faculty requirements impacted students' choice of references; (9) students/administrators provided more feedback than faculty; and (10) stakeholder collaboration was needed.; Stakeholders “Levels of Concern” about information literacy competencies varied. An action plan to implement this construct was suggested and is being reviewed at “Private University.” Objectives should be to (1) develop a formal information literacy action plan; (2) promote an understanding of the differences between information literacy and computer literacy; (3) increase the use of research databases and decrease the use of the Internet/WWW; and (4) mandate faculty/librarian collaboration regarding these objectives. These actions should lead toward collaborative teaching and learning among all stakeholder groups.
机译:问题。本研究的目的是确定本科生,教职员工和管理人员对信息素养能力的重视程度以及是否正在教授/学习这些技能。这项研究的基本目的是使这些利益相关者对这些技能有所认识。 方法。 “私人大学”的利益相关者志愿者样本完成了自行设计的问卷调查和访谈。解决了高等教育信息素养能力标准(2000)的标准二中的“绩效指标”和“成果”。为了控制内容的有效性,八位信息素养专家在设计工具时提供了投入。调查问题侧重于特定技能。开放式访谈问题邀请利益相关者表达意见。聚集的条形图和表格显示了响应百分比。研究人员将问卷评论和访谈回复进行了后编码。为了以实际的方式应用结果,将回答与组织变革理论中描述的“关注阶段”(基于关注点的采用模型)(CBAM)进行了比较。 结果。收集了141/428名本科生和24/71名教职员工/管理员的反馈。与会者绝大多数都认为这些技能很重要。许多教师/行政人员认为学生已经从图书馆员/教师那里学习了这些技能,但是许多学生回答说他们没有学习这些技能或者他们是自学成才的。出现了十个发现:(1)学生的首选研究是互联网/ WWW; (2)尚无正式计划在“私立大学”教授这些技能; (3)利益相关者群体对技术的看法不同; (4)在理解信息素养的含义和计算机素养之间存在困惑; (5)图书馆员是未开发的资源; (6)学生缺乏进行有效在线搜索的知识; (7)许多教师没有评估学生的推荐信; (8)教职要求影响了学生对推荐人的选择; (9)学生/管理人员提供的反馈比教师多; (10)需要利益相关者的协作。利益相关者对信息素养能力的“关注水平”各不相同。提出了实施此构架的行动计划,该计划正在“私人大学”进行审查。目标应是(1)制定正式的信息素养行动计划; (2)增进对信息素养和计算机素养之间差异的理解; (3)增加研究数据库的使用并减少Internet / WWW的使用; (4)就这些目标授权教职员工/图书馆员合作。这些行动应导致所有利益相关者团体之间进行协作的教与学。

著录项

  • 作者

    Costantino, Connie Ellen.;

  • 作者单位

    Alliant International University, San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 Alliant International University, San Diego.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.; Library Science.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 415 p.
  • 总页数 415
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;图书馆学、图书馆事业;高等教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号