首页> 外文学位 >An Analysis Comparing Student Knowledge Acquisition in a Traditional Face-to-Face Classroom to a Hybrid Course
【24h】

An Analysis Comparing Student Knowledge Acquisition in a Traditional Face-to-Face Classroom to a Hybrid Course

机译:传统面对面课堂与混合课程的学生知识习得比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A problem exists regarding supportive evidence to determine the differences in student knowledge acquisition at the secondary level between a traditional face-to-face classroom and a hybrid course. The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to compare student knowledge acquisition in a face-to-face traditional classroom, where direct instruction was applied, to a hybrid classroom, where the instructor acted as a facilitator and online course modules were designed to enhance the learning process. Participants were classified as sophomore, junior, or senior at a public high school and varied in ethnicity, gender, and age. The independent variable was identified as the type of instructional method applied during the study: (a) direct instruction model, or (b) hybrid model. The dependent variables were defined as two components: (a) knowledge acquisition, measured by a pretest and posttest of student knowledge in the course, and (b) student preferences toward their course experience in the hybrid course, as assessed through a five-point Likert scale instrument, administered post intervention questionnaire. Variances were determined to be equal, and a positive one tailed t-test on two independent sample means was conducted to determine whether the treatment had a directional effect and influence on knowledge acquisition. The posttest p -value was .05, which was equal to a .05 level of significance. These statistical findings indicated the treatment did have an effect on student knowledge acquisition, and 76% of students surveyed preferred a hybrid learning environment as compared to a traditional face-to-face learning environment. It was hoped this study would offer further support to the body of knowledge needed to address this problem by offering additional quantitative data on student knowledge acquisition for hybrid courses. This research could have an impact on teaching models at the secondary model by transforming traditional classrooms into more technological hybrid learning environments.
机译:在确定传统中学面对面教室和混合课程之间的中学阶段学生知识获取差异方面,有关支持性证据存在问题。这项准实验性研究的目的是将采用直接指导的面对面传统教室与采用混合教室的传统教室进行学生知识获取的比较,在混合教室中,讲师充当促进者,在线课程模块旨在增强学习过程。参加者在公立高中被分类为大二,初中或大四,种族,性别和年龄各不相同。自变量被确定为研究期间采用的教学方法的类型:(a)直接教学模型,或(b)混合模型。因变量被定义为两个组成部分:(a)知识获取,通过课程中学生知识的预测试和后测试来衡量;(b)学生对混合课程中课程经验的偏好,通过五点评估李克特量表,进行干预后问卷调查。方差被确定为相等,并且在两个独立的样本均值上进行了阳性的单尾t检验,以确定该处理是否对知识获取有方向性作用和影响。测验后的p值为0.05,等于0.05的显着性水平。这些统计结果表明,该处理确实对学生的知识获取有影响,与传统的面对面学习环境相比,接受调查的学生中有76%的学生更喜欢混合学习环境。希望这项研究将通过提供有关混合课程学生知识获取的其他定量数据,为解决该问题所需的知识体系提供进一步的支持。通过将传统教室转变为技术含量更高的混合学习环境,这项研究可能会对中学模型的教学模型产生影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Murphy, Colleen.;

  • 作者单位

    Missouri Baptist University.;

  • 授予单位 Missouri Baptist University.;
  • 学科 Business education.;Educational technology.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 147 p.
  • 总页数 147
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号