首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of the Florida State Horticultural Society >Comparing the Costs and Educational Value of Delivering Distance Education Programming versus Traditional Face-to-face Classroom Education
【24h】

Comparing the Costs and Educational Value of Delivering Distance Education Programming versus Traditional Face-to-face Classroom Education

机译:比较传统教育规划的成本和教育价值与传统面对面教室教育

获取原文

摘要

Extension clients have indicated that to remain competitive in a changing industry they need educational programming (DeCamp et al., 2001). In the past, this was accomplished through a face-to-face classroom setting (Chambers et al., 2006). Although research has shown that the value of classroom delivery is still important, producers have become concerned with increases in the cost of traveling to a live classroom (DeCamp et al., 2001). In an effort to help curtail costs associated with face-to-faceworkshops while still delivering pertinent educational resources, a statewide team of University of Florida/IFAS Commercial Horticulture Extension educators began authoring a series of monthly articles in a regional commercial nursery industry magazine.The purpose of this study was to compare costs associated with traveling to a traditional face-to-face classroom situation against costs incurred through receiving the same material via distance education. This study determined the effectiveness, satisfaction, and quality of the resources delivered via distance education.
机译:扩展客户指出,在改变行业中保持竞争力,他们需要教育编程(Decamp等,2001)。在过去,这是通过面对面的课堂设置完成的(Chambers等,2006)。虽然研究表明,课堂交付的价值仍然很重要,但生产者致力于增加前往现场教室的成本(Decamp等,2001)。努力帮助削减与面对面的人相关的成本,同时仍然提供相关的教育资源,佛罗里达大学/ IFAS商业园艺推广教育者开始在区域商业苗圃行业杂志中创作一系列月刊。该杂志本研究的目的是比较与传统面对面课堂局势相关的成本,以通过远程教育收到相同材料而产生的成本。本研究确定了通过远程教育提供的资源的有效性,满意度和质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号