首页> 外文学位 >Changes in teaching English after the educational reform in Thailand.
【24h】

Changes in teaching English after the educational reform in Thailand.

机译:泰国教育改革后英语教学的变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Learning reform has been proposed in Thailand as it is clearly specified in the national educational act of 1999 that the learning and teaching of all subjects at all levels shall be based on a learner-centered approach. A learner-center approach is new to Thai learners, teachers and educators who have been familiar to rote learning, and memorization. Therefore, it is important to investigate how a learner-centered approach has been defined and implemented in the classrooms teaching English.;This study used four different methods: document analysis, observations, interviews and stimulated recalls to triangulate the result of the study. The findings of the three research questions are following:;It was found that policy makers, policy distributors, supervisors and teachers had similar definitions of a learner-centered approach. All mentioned that the goal of teaching and learning was to develop learners to their optimal level. Learning and teaching activities were designed to meet learner's needs and interests. However, they all had different concepts of a learner-centered approach in terms of the implementation of a learner-centered approach in the classroom. The policy makers emphasized five major roles teachers should take in order to meet learners' differences. On the other hand, the Ministry of Education had its own interpretation of a learner-centered approach. In this interpretation, teachers' roles were decreased and learners' roles were increased. All supervisors and teachers received knowledge through policy distributors.;How did these three teachers actually teach English in their classrooms? Based on classroom interaction patterns in the three classrooms, it was found that none of the three teachers used group work or pair work, which is the most important feature of communicative language teaching. The three teachers were highly teacher centered, especially Teacher A who used 99% of her class time in whole class activity. Teacher B and C are less teacher centered because of the effort of decreasing whole class activities, and the use of activities such as Total Physical Response, and singing. However, they were trained to use only drill activities not communicative activities; as a result, there were no communicative activities or communicative tasks.;The use of target language in these three classes was not high. None of them used English more than 50%. The avoidance of using the target language was due to teachers' low English proficiency, teachers' lack of confidence, and learners' low proficiency.;These teachers reported these problems in implementation of a learner-centered approach: standard of teacher education, knowledge of a learner-centered approach provided, lack of training for teachers, supervisor qualifications, amount of administrative support, proficiency of learners. These teachers specified their personal problems such as heavy teaching load, low qualification and unsupportive working environment.
机译:泰国已经提出了学习改革的建议,因为在1999年的国家教育法中明确规定,各级所有学科的学与教应以学习者为中心。以学习者为中心的方法对于熟悉死记硬背和记忆的泰国学习者,教师和教育者来说是新的。因此,研究如何在以英语为母语的课堂上定义和实施以学习者为中心的方法非常重要。该研究使用了四种不同的方法:文档分析,观察,访谈和刺激性回忆来对研究结果进行三角测量。以下是这三个研究问题的发现:发现政策制定者,政策分发者,主管和教师对以学习者为中心的方法有相似的定义。所有人都提到,教学的目的是使学习者发展到最佳水平。学习和教学活动旨在满足学习者的需求和兴趣。但是,就在课堂上实施以学习者为中心的方法而言,他们都具有以学习者为中心的方法的不同概念。政策制定者强调了教师应发挥的五个主要作用,以满足学习者的差异。另一方面,教育部对以学习者为中心的方法有自己的解释。在这种解释中,教师的角色减少了,学习者的角色增加了。所有主管和老师都是通过政策发布者获得知识的;这三位老师实际上是如何在教室里教英语的?根据三个教室的课堂互动模式,发现三位老师中没有一个使用小组作业或配对作业,这是交际语言教学的最重要特征。这三位老师都是以老师为中心的,尤其是A老师,她在整个课堂活动中使用了99%的课堂时间。老师B和老师C的老师较少,因为他们减少了全班活动,并使用了诸如“全面身体反应”和“唱歌”之类的活动。但是,他们经过培训只能使用演习活动,而不能使用交际活动。结果,没有进行交际活动或交际任务。在这三门课中,目标语言的使用率不高。他们使用英语的比例都不超过50%。避免使用目标语言是由于教师英语水平低,教师缺乏信心以及学习者的英语水平低。这些教师在实施以学习者为中心的方法时报告了这些问题:教师的教育水平,对知识的了解提供了一种以学习者为中心的方法,缺乏对教师的培训,主管资格,行政支持数量,学习者的熟练程度。这些老师指出了他们的个人问题,例如教学负担沉重,学历低和工作环境不利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Prapaisit, Lakhana.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Language Linguistics.;Education Teacher Training.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 227 p.
  • 总页数 227
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号