首页> 外文学位 >Closing the Achievement Gap Between Boys and Girls
【24h】

Closing the Achievement Gap Between Boys and Girls

机译:缩小男孩和女孩之间的成就差距

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The critical role of accountability on schools has intensified the need to understand the impact of intervention strategies and best practices on literacy. Of particular concern is the underachievement of boys and identifying the learning differences between boys and girls. Examined in this quantitative study were the strategies and practices implemented by Blue Ribbon and Gold Star school educators to increase the literacy skills of primary-aged boys. Strategies and practices were determined through a Likert scale survey distributed to six Missouri Blue Ribbon and Gold Star schools and an equal number of schools that were not meeting Adequate Yearly Progress. The survey was designed to collect information regarding the strategies and practices perceived as effective in improving the achievement of fourth grade boys in literacy and discover the underlying reasons boys underachieve in this area. Recipients were prompted to choose the top 10 strategies and practices, in the area of communication arts, from a list of several criteria. Then, the respondents chose five criteria, from the top 10, as the most effective in developing the literacy skills of boys. A bar graph was formulated to report this information. To overcome the limitations of a small sample, outcomes of the Hawley and Reichert (2009) and the Cleveland (2011) study were compared to the survey responses. Similar results within the three studies were the variety of assessment techniques to inform instruction; ongoing collaboration between teachers and administration; and working with students in small groups which provide boys leadership roles, teamwork, and competition. Nonacademic factors also influenced the academic success of boys. While there are many variables affecting the learning differences between boys and girls, most critical is for educators and parents to become aware of these differences.
机译:问责制在学校中的关键作用加剧了对理解干预策略和最佳实践对扫盲的影响的需求。特别令人关注的是男孩的学习成绩不佳,以及男孩和女孩之间的学习差异。在这项定量研究中检验了蓝丝带和金星学校教育者实施的提高小学男孩识字能力的策略和实践。通过对六个密苏里州蓝丝带和金星学校以及未达到适当的“年度进度”的相同数量的学校进行李克特量表调查,确定了策略和实践。该调查旨在收集有关被认为对提高四年级男孩识字率有效的策略和实践的信息,并发现男孩在该领域成绩不佳的根本原因。提示收件人从一系列标准中选择传播艺术领域的前十大策略和实践。然后,受访者从前十名中选择了五个标准,作为最有效地发展男孩识字能力的标准。制定了条形图以报告此信息。为了克服少量样本的局限性,将Hawley和Reichert(2009)和Cleveland(2011)研究的结果与调查回应进行了比较。在这三项研究中,类似的结果是使用多种评估技术来指导教学。教师与行政部门之间的持续合作;并与小组中的学生合作,提供男孩的领导角色,团队合作和竞争。非学术因素也影响男孩的学业成就。尽管有许多变量会影响男孩和女孩之间的学习差异,但最关键的是让教育者和父母意识到这些差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Finley, Helen.;

  • 作者单位

    Lindenwood University.;

  • 授予单位 Lindenwood University.;
  • 学科 Elementary education.;Educational tests measurements.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 121 p.
  • 总页数 121
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号