首页> 外文学位 >Genesis by the Book: Augustinian Literalism in the Latin Epic 'Hexaemeron' and Milton's 'Paradise Lost'
【24h】

Genesis by the Book: Augustinian Literalism in the Latin Epic 'Hexaemeron' and Milton's 'Paradise Lost'

机译:该书的创世纪:拉丁史诗《六面兽》中的奥古斯丁文学主义和米尔顿的《失乐园》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

St. Augustine's commentary on Genesis, The Literal Meaning of Genesis, was groundbreaking for its innovative exegesis as much as its thoroughness. His undertaking reflected a desire within the culture of Late Antiquity to account for our origins in a manner that was radically different from what was found in the pagan philosophy and literature by which early Christians were educated. As his commentary grew in popularity through the ages it gained authority, serving as the primary means of reading Genesis for Catholics and Protestants alike. His interpretive project had as its goal the literal meaning of the author, of what actually happened, not the literal meaning of his words about what happened. Each reader was free to discover, as much as possible, the author's intent according to the contextual requirements and the demands of faith. This dissertation explores how Augustine's interpretation of Genesis gave impetus to the hexaemeral epic, establishing his commentary as the primary link between the chief poems forming the tradition and its culminating hexaemeron, Milton's Paradise Lost.;The hexaemeral epic blossomed in Late Antiquity, fell dormant in the Middle Ages when allegory was especially prevalant, and reemerged in profusion during the Renaissance. Consequently, scholars often overlook the lasting importance of the early epics that gave shape to those of the Renaissance. In fact, scholars have devoted much attention to the classical sources of Renaissance epic without commenting on the Christian sources through which the epics were often mediated. The Latin hexaemeral epics of Victor, Dracontius, and Avitus provided later Christians with models that demonstrated precisely how to apply interpretive methods to their Biblical material. Augustine, following Ambrose, presented Genesis in such a way that made it suitable for versification, and his commentary was soon established as a conventional reference in all epic hexaemera. This study argues that Augustine's literalism was the dominant interpretive mode of the epic hexaemeron, established by the earliest epic hexaemeralists and later embraced by Milton.;In each chapter, I locate Augustine's centrality to a particular hexaemeron, weighing his influence against those commentaries that either inspired or responded to it. This study concludes with one of the last and most successful epic hexaemera, Paradise Lost, in order to show that Augustinian literalism was a central feature of that literary tradition throughout its long lifespan. The distance in time between the poets shrinks with the shared reading of Augustine. Moreover, a decidedly Protestant hexaemeron like Milton's reveals the extent to which Augustine transcended denominational divides. This dissertation contributes to our understanding of the development of the Biblical epic and the patristic influences that gave shape to it.
机译:圣奥古斯丁对创世记的注释,即《创世记的字面意义》,由于其创新的诠释学和详尽性而具有开创性意义。他的所作所为反映出,在上古文化中渴望以与在早期基督教徒受教的异教哲学和文学中发现的方式截然不同的方式来解释我们的起源。随着他的评论随着年龄的增长而流行,它获得了权威,成为了天主教徒和新教徒阅读《创世纪》的主要手段。他的解释性项目的目标是作者的字面意思,实际发生的事情,而不是他所说的有关发生的事情的字面意思。每个读者都可以根据上下文要求和信仰要求尽可能自由地发现作者的意图。本文探讨了奥古斯丁对创世记的解释如何推动了十六世纪的史诗,确立了他的评论作为构成该传统的主要诗词和其最高的第六世纪的米尔顿的《天堂迷失》之间的主要纽带。在寓言盛行的中世纪,到了文艺复兴时期又重新盛行。因此,学者们常常忽略了早期史诗的持久重要性,这些史诗对文艺复兴时期的史诗形成了影响。实际上,学者们对文艺复兴时期史诗的经典资源投入了极大的关注,却没有评论通常通过其传播史诗的基督教资源。 Victor,Dracontius和Avitus的拉丁十六进制史诗为后来的基督徒提供了模型,这些模型精确地展示了如何将解释方法应用于其圣经材料。奥古斯丁(Augusose)紧随安布罗斯(Ambrose)之后,提出了《创世纪》(Genesis),使其适合于证词化,他的评论很快被确立为所有史诗般的六面体的常规参考。这项研究认为,奥古斯丁的文字主义是史诗的六面体的主要解释方式,由最早的史诗六面体主义者建立,后来被弥尔顿所接受;在每一章中,我都将奥古斯丁的地位放在特定的六面体上,权衡他的影响力与那些评论中的影响启发或回应。本研究以最后一个也是最成功的史诗六边形之一《失落的天堂》作为结尾,以表明奥古斯丁文字主义是该文学传统在其整个生命周期中的主要特征。诗人之间的时间间隔随着奥古斯丁的共同阅读而缩小。此外,像米尔顿(Milton)这样的绝对新教的六聚体表明奥古斯丁超越宗派划分的程度。本论文有助于我们理解圣经史诗的发展以及由此形成的爱国主义影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dion, Noah Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Comparative literature.;English literature.;Classical literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 236 p.
  • 总页数 236
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号