首页> 外文学位 >Conceptual and epistemological undercurrents of learning as a process of change.
【24h】

Conceptual and epistemological undercurrents of learning as a process of change.

机译:作为变化过程的学习的概念和认识论暗流。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the preparation and education of civil engineers it is essential to both increase student knowledge of the world (conceptual understanding), but also to establish and develop new ways of thinking (epistemology). Both of these processes of change can be considered learning, but they are vastly different in the time, energy and resources they require to accomplish. The second type of learning (conceptual change) is more difficult, and is only rarely accomplished in traditional university education. The purpose of this research is to apply existing research approaches from cognitive science and educational psychology to explain why by investigating conceptual change in the contexts of student learning and faculty adoption of new pedagogies. In each context, the difficulty with conceptual change was associated with the ways in which people categorize fundamental phenomena in the world around them, and with epistemological expectations of how those categorizations should be applied in new contexts. While attempts to encourage change often focus on "educating" people by providing them with more knowledge, the change processes seem to be primarily limited by people's existing knowledge and how it is structured. Because civil engineers interact closely with societal goals and processes (such as human safety and environmental policies), they adopt epistemological stances that are as-yet unaccounted for in most research on the subject, which assumes a strong distinction between epistemological stances toward the physical world compared to the social world. These differences suggest that civil engineers' conceptual change could be enhanced by more directly addressing their particular epistemological stances---which incorporate high needs for certainty in guaranteeing human safety, as well as high flexibility when being applied to human systems.
机译:在土木工程师的准备和教育中,既要增加学生对世界的了解(概念理解),又要建立和发展新的思维方式(认识论),这是至关重要的。这两个变化过程都可以视为学习过程,但是它们在完成所需的时间,精力和资源上截然不同。第二种学习方式(观念上的改变)比较困难,在传统的大学教育中很少能完成。这项研究的目的是运用认知科学和教育心理学的现有研究方法,通过在学生学习和教师采用新教学法的背景下调查概念的变化来解释其原因。在每种情况下,概念变化的困难都与人们对周围世界中基本现象进行分类的方式以及对在新环境中应如何应用这些分类的认识论期望有关。尽管鼓励变革的尝试通常侧重于通过为人们提供更多知识来“教育”人们,但变革过程似乎主要受到人们现有知识及其结构的限制。由于土木工程师与社会目标和流程(例如人类安全和环境政策)密切互动,因此他们采用了认识论立场,但在大多数关于该主题的研究中却没有说明这些观点,这是对现实世界的认识论立场之间存在强烈的区分与社交世界相比。这些差异表明,可以通过更直接地解决其特定的认识论立场来增强土木工程师的概念变化,这些立场包含了对确保人身安全的高度确定性的要求,以及应用于人类系统时的高度灵活性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Montfort, Devlin B.;

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University.;

  • 授予单位 Washington State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.;Education Philosophy of.;Education Higher.;Education Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 255 p.
  • 总页数 255
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号