首页> 外文学位 >Valuing value: Value-in-use and marketing performance.
【24h】

Valuing value: Value-in-use and marketing performance.

机译:重视价值:使用价值和营销绩效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A unified subject matter defines every scientific discipline. Marketing then, like other disciplines, consists of a finite set of core concepts. This dissertation focuses specifically on the core concept of "value" as being among the most central of concepts and more specifically elaborates theoretically on the concept of value-in-use. Historically, marketing's received view suggests customer satisfaction is a key contributor to firm success. However, the extant literature reports a weak relation between customer satisfaction and a firm's organizational performance (Woodruff, 1997). This dissertation makes a theoretical case for value as among the most telling metrics in all of marketing and considers the extent to which value drives marketing and business performance.;The recent paradigm shift toward a service-dominant logic (SDL) suggests that the underlying premise of any exchange relationship is for parties to perform activities for each other that create value (Vargo and Lusch 2004). A strong conceptual background of value-in-use exists in the SDL literature, but to date the concept remains unintegrated into the larger theoretical net. The advancement of SDL requires a theoretically sound and well-delineated value-in-use construct. This research builds on previous theory on value and its role in capturing marketing outcomes for consumers and businesses (Zeithaml 1988; Babin, Darden and Griffin 1994).;A multipronged research approach is taken. Interpretive research provides in-depth descriptions of value expressions and the meanings of experience. A descriptive research approach in the form of a broad-based consumer survey allows the development and testing of a measurement theory necessary to examine research questions related to value, satisfaction and performance. The survey employs a representative sample of US consumers obtained through a worldwide online-panel firm. A graphic overview of the potential conceptual framework is as follows:*.;The study offers a three-fold contribution. First, a thorough development of the evolutionary concept of value-in-use is undertaken. A shift in focus from "value in exchange" to "value-in-use" provides an important strategic development to the marketing discipline. The majority of value studies conducted through marketing history assess consumers' "value perceptions" before consumption takes place and are therefore more representative of "value expectation" than of value itself.;Second, an assessment of the relationship between value, satisfaction, and quality with business performance measures will enable managers to employ the best marketing customer metric with the performance measures that are most valuable to the firm. Overcoming the customer satisfaction trap with more appropriate concepts that actually relate to firm outcome measures will be a contribution to both the academic and practitioner literature (Dahlsten 2003). In other words, firms that pursue customer satisfaction at the expense of value are caught in a trap if value is more critical in shaping performance than is satisfaction.;Third, this dissertation matches select firms in two industries consistent with the American Satisfaction Index. The two industries are airlines and retailers. Department stores, discount stores, and supermarkets comprise the retailers. The present samples will allow assessment of the value measure across different contexts to provide further evidence of the impact of value.;Key results point to a correlation between hedonic value, overall value, and performance metrics including ROA and EPS in the retail context. Contextual differences emerged with respect to retailers' success with utilitarian value and airlines' success with hedonic value. The use of an overall value question, in conjunction with satisfaction, directly relating to outcome variables including loyalty and performance variables met with mixed success.;*Please refer to dissertation for diagram.
机译:统一的主题定义了每个科学学科。像其他学科一样,市场营销则由有限的核心概念组成。本论文主要关注“价值”这一最核心的核心概念,更具体地讲关于使用价值的概念。从历史上看,市场营销的观点认为,客户满意度是企业成功的关键因素。但是,现有文献报道客户满意度与公司组织绩效之间的关系较弱(Woodruff,1997)。本文从理论上论证了价值是所有营销中最有说服力的指标之一,并考虑了价值在多大程度上推动了营销和业务绩效。;最近向服务主导逻辑(SDL)的范式转变表明,潜在前提是任何交换关系的一方都是当事方为创造价值而彼此开展活动(Vargo and Lusch 2004)。 SDL文献中有很强的使用价值概念背景,但迄今为止,该概念仍未集成到较大的理论网络中。 SDL的发展需要理论上合理且轮廓分明的使用价值构造。这项研究建立在先前关于价值及其在获取消费者和企业营销成果中的作用的理论基础上(Zeithaml 1988; Babin,Darden和Griffin 1994)。采用了多方面的研究方法。解释性研究对价值表达和经验的含义进行了深入的描述。以广泛的消费者调查为形式的描述性研究方法,可以开发和测试度量理论,以检验与价值,满意度和绩效有关的研究问题。该调查采用通过一家全球在线面板公司获得的美国消费者的代表性样本。潜在概念框架的图形概述如下:* .;该研究提供了三方面的贡献。首先,对使用价值演变概念进行了彻底的发展。从“交换价值”到“使用价值”的重点转移为营销学科提供了重要的战略发展。通过营销历史进行的大多数价值研究都在消费发生之前评估了消费者的“价值观念”,因此比“价值本身”更能代表“价值期望”。其次,对价值,满意度和质量之间的关系进行了评估。具有业务绩效指标的管理器将使管理人员能够采用最佳营销客户指标以及对公司最有价值的绩效指标。用更合适的概念来克服客户满意度陷阱,这些概念实际上与公司的成果度量有关,这将对学术和从业者文献都有贡献(Dahlsten 2003)。换句话说,如果价值对绩效的影响比对满意度的影响更为关键,那么以价值为代价追求客户满意度的公司就会陷入陷阱。第三,本文将与美国满意度指数相一致的两个行业的精选公司进行匹配。这两个行业是航空公司和零售商。百货公司,折扣店和超级市场组成零售商。本样本将允许评估不同情况下的价值度量,以提供价值影响的进一步证据。关键结果表明享乐价值,整体价值与包括零售环境中ROA和EPS在内的绩效指标之间的相关性。在具有功利主义价值的零售商成功与具有享乐主义价值的航空公司的成功方面,存在上下文差异。总体价值问题与满意度的结合使用,直接关系到结果变量,包括忠诚度和绩效变量,但成功与否混合; *请参阅论文以获取图表。

著录项

  • 作者

    James, Kevin William.;

  • 作者单位

    Louisiana Tech University.;

  • 授予单位 Louisiana Tech University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Marketing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 216 p.
  • 总页数 216
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号