首页> 外文学位 >Pleasure, persuasion and the good in Plato's 'Gorgias'.
【24h】

Pleasure, persuasion and the good in Plato's 'Gorgias'.

机译:柏拉图的《戈尔吉亚斯》中的乐趣,说服力和优点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Plato believes that part of philosophy's task is to persuade people to pursue virtue and wisdom instead of the things they falsely believe worth having. I argue that Plato considers the appetites—desires for pleasure—to be a major obstacle to this task, and turns to spirit (thumos) as a solution to this dilemma.; The Gorgias shows Socrates attempting but failing to persuade others, and offers an explanation for his failures. Socrates' method is beneficial but unpleasant: he frustrates people's desires to be confirmed in their values and ways of life. Rhetoric, meanwhile, is persuasive precisely because it is pleasant: it gratifies the very desires that dialectic frustrates. Most people confuse pleasure with benefit, and therefore resist dialectic but are persuaded by rhetoric. These facts raise the possibility that rhetoric could aid philosophy, exploiting the appetites for philosophy's ends. The dialogue concludes pessimistically, however: given the nature of the appetites, they cannot be used to lead people to virtue.; I show that Plato's mistrust of the appetites is explained by his idea that pleasure is a deceiver: it appears to be good when it is not. Plato develops this idea in the Protagoras, Gorgias and Republic . Ultimately, it leads him to abandon the Socratic view that all desires are rational desires for the good in favor of the view that desires for pleasure are non-rational and must be suppressed.; How can one make people see that the life of virtue is good if they are deceived by the appearance that the pleasant but vicious life is best? The Gorgias' discussion of shame suggests an answer to this problem. What is shameful appears bad, and what is kalon (beautiful or fine) appears good. These appearances often conflict with, and can overcome, the false appearances generated by pleasures. Therefore appeals to shame and admiration can succeed where appeals to reason will fail. With its introduction of thumos the Republic develops this insight into a new picture of the soul, and a new program for moral education.
机译:柏拉图认为,哲学任务的一部分是说服人们追求美德和智慧,而不是他们错误地认为值得拥有的东西。我认为,柏拉图认为食欲是对这项任务的主要障碍,而转向精神( thumos )可以解决这一难题。 Gorgias 显示了苏格拉底试图但未能说服他人的原因,并为他的失败提供了解释。苏格拉底的方法是有益的,但令人不快的:他挫败了人们渴望在其价值观和生活方式上得到证实的愿望。同时,修辞学之所以具有说服力,恰恰是因为它令人愉快:它满足了使辩证法感到沮丧的渴望。大多数人将享乐与收益混为一谈,因此抵制辩证法,但却被修辞学说服。这些事实增加了修辞学可以帮助哲学,挖掘食欲达到哲学目的的可能性。然而,对话是悲观地结束的:鉴于食欲的本质,它们不能被用来引导人们追求美德。我证明柏拉图对食欲的不信任是由他认为愉悦是欺骗者的想法来解释的:愉悦是欺骗的感觉,这似乎是好的。柏拉图在 Protagoras,Gorgias Republic 中提出了这个想法。最终,这使他放弃了苏格拉底式的观点,即所有欲望都是对善的理性欲望,而转而认为愉悦欲望是非理性的,必须加以抑制。如果人们被愉悦而邪恶的生活最好的表象所欺骗,如何使人们看到美德的生活是美好的? Gorgias 关于羞耻的讨论提出了这个问题的答案。可耻的东西看起来很不好,而 kalon (漂亮或很好)的东西似乎很好。这些外表常常与享乐产生的虚假表象相抵触,并且可以克服。因此,对羞辱和钦佩的呼吁可以在对理性的呼吁失败的地方获得成功。通过 thumos 的引入, Republic 将这种见识发展为灵魂的新图景和新的道德教育计划。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moss, Jessica Dawn.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号