首页> 外文学位 >Technological innovation and policy responses in health care.
【24h】

Technological innovation and policy responses in health care.

机译:卫生保健中的技术创新和政策对策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation consists of three papers, two quantitative and one mixed-methods. Paper 1 uses cross-sectional and logistic regression analyses of survey data to assess Americans' opinion on the use of cost effectiveness research (CER) in government health coverage decisions, and to examine the factors predicting approval or disapproval of specific decisions. I use vignettes drawn from real international decisions to assess opinions. I find that opposition to a CER agency is widespread, with partisan affiliations playing a significant role. In general, Republicans are more likely to oppose a government agency playing a role in cost effectiveness determinations. With regards to specific examples, Americans hold even greater opposition, with no significant differences by political affiliations.;Paper 2 evaluates the hospital- and state-level factors influencing hospital adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), attempting to identify levers subject to influence by policy makers in the ongoing effort to drive increased adoption. This project employs multi-level poisson regression to examine cross-state variation in the relationship between hospital function adoption and hospital/state level characteristics. I find that a multitude of factors influence hospital EHR adoption, with several subject to influence by policy makers. In particular, prospective financial incentives at the state level to hospitals struggling to break even financially have a noted effect in increasing adoption.;Paper 3 uses a mixed-methods approach to answer the question of whether hospitals view the requirements of the EHR meaningful use incentive program as a floor, above which further development continues, or as a ceiling on their adoption efforts. I draw three key findings from this research: first, the requirements serve as either a floor or a ceiling, depending on the abilities of the facility implementing EHRs. Second, the increasing focus on meeting the requirements risks missing the forest of health care system change through the trees of meeting discrete requirements. Without further development on the technology needed for managing population health, the American health care system lacks the infrastructure for successful health reform. Third, while the meaningful use incentive program has accelerated the development and implementation of some functions, it has also slowed development of other important functions.
机译:本文由三篇论文组成,两篇定量论文和一本混合方法。论文1使用调查数据的横断面和逻辑回归分析来评估美国人对在政府医疗保险决策中使用成本效益研究(CER)的意见,并检查预测特定决策批准或不批准的因素。我使用从真正的国际决定中得出的小插曲来评估意见。我发现反对CER机构的情况很普遍,党派之间的关系起着重要作用。一般而言,共和党人更有可能反对在确定成本效益方面发挥作用的政府机构。关于具体的例子,美国人持更大的反对意见,在政治上没有明显的不同。;论文2评估了影响医院采用电子健康记录(EHR)的医院和州级因素,试图找出可能受到影响的杠杆决策者在不断努力以提高采用率方面所做的努力。该项目采用多级泊松回归来检验医院功能采用与医院/州级特征之间关系的跨州变异。我发现影响医院电子病历的因素很多,其中一些因素会受到政策制定者的影响。特别是,州一级对财务状况难以达到收支平衡的医院的预期财务激励措施对采用率的提高有显着影响。;论文3使用混合方法来回答医院是否看待《电子病历》有意义使用激励措施的问题计划作为基础,在该基础之上可以进一步发展,或者作为对其采用工作的上限。我从这项研究中得出三个主要结论:首先,根据实施EHR的设施的能力,要求可以作为最低要求或最高要求。其次,越来越关注满足要求的风险在于,由于满足离散要求的树而错过了医疗保健系统的森林变化。没有进一步发展用于管理人口健康的技术,美国的医疗体系就缺乏成功进行医疗改革的基础设施。第三,有意义的使用激励计划虽然加速了某些功能的开发和实施,但也减慢了其他重要功能的开发。

著录项

  • 作者

    Botta, Michael David.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Health care management.;Information technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 123 p.
  • 总页数 123
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号