首页> 外文学位 >Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies.
【24h】

Justice under constraints: The nature of transitional justice in deeply divided societies.

机译:约束下的正义:在深度分化的社会中过渡正义的性质。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is an examination of transitional justice in deeply divided societies with a particular emphasis on South Africa. Given the complexities of the transition from authoritarianism to democracy, a special model of justice is necessary between these two political orders. Although the ideal model of societal justice is democratic justice, it is unlikely in the transition to democracy. Nonetheless a model of justice is necessary to function as a viable transitional justice model while preparing the way for democratic justice as the eventual model of justice. In this regard I detail two candidate theories of transitional justice: restorative and retributive justice. I conclude that given the particularities of the South African transitional situation neither restorative nor retributive justice are viable as transitional justice because they end up primarily focusing on the moral/political aspect of equality while neglecting or demeaning the necessity of material equality in a society so marred and inundated by socio-economic inequality. The main conclusion reached is that Apartheid in South Africa amounted to a historic injustice which can only be rectified through a transitional model I develop called reparative justice. It is superior to the previous models of transitional justice because it gives primacy to the material considerations of justice for the transitional period. The mechanism most likely to achieve material equality is through a comprehensive policy of reparations that would aim to rectify historic injustice suffered by blacks in South Africa.
机译:本文是对深度分化的社会中过渡时期司法的考察,其中特别强调了南非。鉴于从威权主义向民主过渡的复杂性,在这两个政治秩序之间必须有一种特殊的正义模式。尽管社会正义的理想模式是民主正义,但在向民主过渡中不太可能。尽管如此,在为民主司法作为最终的司法模式铺平道路的同时,必须要有一种司法模式来充当可行的过渡司法模式。在这方面,我详细介绍了过渡司法的两个候选理论:恢复性司法和报应性司法。我的结论是,鉴于南非过渡局势的特殊性,恢复性司法或报应性司法都不能作为过渡性司法使用,因为它们最终主要侧重于平等的道德/政治方面,而忽视或贬低了如此受损害的社会中物质平等的必要性并被社会经济不平等所淹没。得出的主要结论是,南非的种族隔离构成了历史性的不公正现象,只有通过我发展出的一种称为补偿性正义的过渡模型,才能纠正这种不公正现象。它优于以前的过渡司法模型,因为它在过渡时期将正义的物质考虑放在首位。最有可能实现物质平等的机制是通过一项全面的赔偿政策,旨在纠正南非黑人遭受的历史性不公。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCalpin, Jermaine O.;

  • 作者单位

    Brown University.;

  • 授予单位 Brown University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 239 p.
  • 总页数 239
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论 ; 国际法 ; 民族学 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号