首页> 外文学位 >A conceptual framework of a study in preferred learning styles: Pedagogy or andragogy.
【24h】

A conceptual framework of a study in preferred learning styles: Pedagogy or andragogy.

机译:首选学习方式的研究概念框架:教育学或人类学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was designed to discover and analyze the association between traditional teaching methods and styles and the learning styles and processes of undergraduate, non-traditional, mature adult students. If the following findings suggest a true disparity or mismatch, then a more appropriate remedy should be implemented in order to accommodate both the modern instructors and non-traditional learners. To begin to examine this association, the researcher established a sample consisting of twenty-one subjects: twenty prospective teachers who were Early Childhood Education majors; and the teacher during the summer 2006 semester who was an instructor in the Early Childhood Education Department at Jefferson Community and Technical College, downtown campus in Louisville, Kentucky. All participants were administered the Kolb's Learning Style Inventory Version 3.1 (2005) to assess their preferred learning style. All subjects were also given a demographic survey, and an interview questionnaire. Utilizing the qualitative approach, data analysis revealed that by designing a course based on the learning styles of students, one can determine two benefits: (a) improve student response to the material, and (b) help students become better learners. Filipezak (1995) stated that people are now expected to become lifelong learners, and as such, they must determine their learning preferences to better cope with what and how they learn. Armed with the knowledge that non-traditional students may have been asked to adopt a learning style not best suited for them, instructors must adopt new teaching strategies to meet the diverse learning styles of today's students.
机译:这项研究旨在发现和分析传统的教学方法和方式与本科生,非传统成熟成人学生的学习方式和过程之间的关联。如果以下发现表明确实存在差异或不匹配,则应采取更适当的补救措施,以适应现代教师和非传统学习者的需求。为了开始研究这种关联,研究人员建立了一个样本,该样本由二十一个科目组成:二十名是早期儿童教育专业的准教师;并在2006年夏季学期任教,曾在肯塔基州路易斯维尔市区校区杰斐逊社区和技术学院的幼儿教育系任教。所有参与者都接受了Kolb的学习风格清单3.1版(2005)的评估,以评估他们偏爱的学习风格。还对所有受试者进行了人口统计学调查和访谈问卷。使用定性方法,数据分析显示,通过根据学生的学习风格设计一门课程,可以确定两个好处:(a)提高学生对材料的反应,以及(b)帮助学生成为更好的学习者。 Filipezak(1995)指出,人们现在有望成为终身学习者,因此,他们必须确定学习偏好,以更好地应对所学内容和学习方式。知道可能会要求非传统学生采用最不适合他们的学习方式,因此教师必须采用新的教学策略,以适应当今学生的多样化学习方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号