首页> 外文学位 >The Effects of Choice Theory and Verbal Self-Guidance Instruction on Young Adult Drivers' Locus of Control, Safe Driving Intentions, and Course Satisfaction.
【24h】

The Effects of Choice Theory and Verbal Self-Guidance Instruction on Young Adult Drivers' Locus of Control, Safe Driving Intentions, and Course Satisfaction.

机译:选择理论和言语自学指导对年轻成年驾驶员的控制源,安全驾驶意图和课程满意度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The study was conducted to investigate the effect of combining instruction in Choice Theory and verbal self-guidance (CT/VSG) with driver safety direct instruction (DSDI) on locus of control, safe driving intentions, and course satisfaction in an undergraduate web-enhanced course. For this mixed methods study, a non-equivalent comparison group design (DSDI-Only versus DSDI+CT/VSG) was used in eight sections of a freshman experience web-enhanced course with a total of 118 participants. Four intact class sections were assigned to the DSDI-Only treatment group, and four were assigned to the DSDI+CT/VSG group. Both treatment groups completed online training modules created by the researcher on the topic of risky driving behaviors. Two instruments were administered as pretests---one instrument measured locus of control, and one measured safe driving intentions. Identical instruments were administered as posttests. A course satisfaction questionnaire was administered after training to gather both quantitative and qualitative data.;The independent variable in this study was the instructional strategy DSDI-Only versus DSDI+CT/VSG. The dependent variables were locus of control, safe driving intentions, and course satisfaction.;There was a statistically significant difference in the locus of control between the DSDI-Only and the DSDI+CT/VSG participants, p < .05. After the treatment, the DSDI+CT/VSG participants had a higher degree of internal locus of control than the DSDI-Only participants.;There was a statistically significant difference in the safe driving intention score between the DSDI-Only and the DSDI+CT/VSG participants, p < .05. After the treatment, the DSDI+CT/VSG participants had a higher mean score on the safe driving intention behavior scale that the DSDI-Only participants.;There were no significant differences between the groups on the course satisfaction rating. Qualitative data from the questionnaire indicated that participants in both treatment groups found the instruction to be worthwhile.;It appeared from this study that the DSDI+CT/VSG instructional strategy was effective because it addressed attitudinal and behavioral aspects of driving safety in addition to operational aspects of driving. Therefore, further investigation into DSDI+CT/VSG as an effective instructional strategy for improving driver safety is suggested.
机译:这项研究旨在研究将选择理论和言语自我指导(CT / VSG)与驾驶员安全直接指导(DSDI)相结合的方法,对提高本科生网络水平的控制源,安全驾驶意图和课程满意度的影响课程。对于此混合方法研究,在新生体验网络增强课程的八个部分中使用了一个非等效的比较组设计(仅DSDI与DSDI + CT / VSG),共有118名参与者。将四个完整的班级部分分配给仅使用DSDI的治疗组,将四个班级分配给DSDI + CT / VSG组。两个治疗小组都完成了研究人员针对危险驾驶行为主题创建的在线培训模块。进行了两种仪器的预测试-一种仪器测量了控制位置,一种仪器测量了安全驾驶意图。使用相同的仪器作为后测。培训结束后,我们将收集一份课程满意度问卷,以收集定量和定性数据。本研究的独立变量是仅DSDI与DSDI + CT / VSG的教学策略。因变量是控制源,安全驾驶意图和课程满意度。;仅DSDI参与者和DSDI + CT / VSG参与者之间的控制源存在统计学差异,p <.05。治疗后,DSDI + CT / VSG参与者的内部控制位置要比仅DSDI-On参与者要高;;仅DSDI-CT和VDI参与者之间的安全驾驶意向得分存在统计学差异/ VSG参与者,p <.05。治疗后,DSDI + CT / VSG参与者在安全驾驶意图行为量表上的平均得分高于仅DSDI参与者。;两组之间在课程满意度上没有显着差异。问卷中的定性数据表明,两个治疗组的参与者都认为该指导是有价值的;从这项研究看来,DSDI + CT / VSG的指导策略是有效的,因为它不仅解决了操作安全性方面的态度和行为方面驾驶方面。因此,建议进一步研究DSDI + CT / VSG作为提高驾驶员安全性的有效指导策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCall, Mary Mittlelee.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Alabama.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Alabama.;
  • 学科 Instructional design.;Behavioral sciences.;Education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 157 p.
  • 总页数 157
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药物化学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号