首页> 外文学位 >Engaging students at high cognitive levels in peer-mentored online discussions.
【24h】

Engaging students at high cognitive levels in peer-mentored online discussions.

机译:在同伴辅导的在线讨论中,使学生具有较高的认知水平。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study addresses problems observed in text based online threaded discussion forums used for learning in higher education. Using a One-way Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) research design, students' perceived course satisfaction was measured within positive affective communities, including the role played by student peer mentors and high-level cognition through a unique combination of specific targeted guidelines over a five-week time span. With the tremendous growth of online learning at all grade levels it is important to focus our attention of effective way of enhancing how students are best able to learn. Although the data collected for this study was at the college level, it has important implications for training teachers who will be instructing students in online learning environments at all education levels.; One cognitive problem observed online includes low-level processing, questions, and responses. Often, discussions are conducted without the benefit of guidelines to foster quality interactions.; A second problem deals with students waiting for classmates to read the dialogue, and then write entries based on the postings alone. This problem illustrates the need for quality accountability to actively engage all students in a collaborative peer mentored environment with shared responsibility for learning.; The third problem includes social behaviors detracting students from reaching their full potential. Since online discussions are social in nature, it is essential to examine the social components within the context of building the online academic learning community.; The National pilot included 51 participants to test the reliability of the survey instruments, with two additional pilots and the actual study using three intact online courses. The combined online class participants totaled 38 students. All three courses were taken from a small Midwest university in a course on Webpage Design. The combined classroom demographics included 24 female and 14 male students geographically dispersed across the United States. Students include undergraduate pre-service teachers, maintaining accreditation, seeking a Masters degree, industry, or continuing education. The students collectively represent primarily Instructional Design Technology in wide range of discipline areas. The study participants are from three different courses using the same instructor, curriculum, and textbook materials.; Directions for future research include: (1) Refinement of the affective community, peer group, peer mentor, and cognitive guidelines; (2) Refinement of the perceived affective community, peer group, peer mentor, and cognitive survey questions; (3) Issues associated with the use of positive affective community, peer groups, peer mentoring and high-level cognition; (4) Refined pedagogy; and (5) Improved web-based management systems reflecting the needed underlying educational pedagogy.
机译:本研究解决了在高等教育中用于学习的基于文本的在线主题讨论论坛中观察到的问题。通过使用单向重复方差分析(ANOVA)研究设计,在积极的情感社区中对学生的感知课程满意度进行了测量,包括学生同伴导师的作用和通过特定针对性指南的独特组合而获得的高级认知五周的时间跨度。随着各个年级所有在线学习的迅猛发展,将注意力集中在提高学生最有效学习方式的有效方法上非常重要。尽管本研究收集的数据是在大学层面上进行的,但它对于培训教师将具有重要意义,这些教师将在所有教育水平上的在线学习环境中指导学生。在线观察到的一个认知问题包括低级处理,问题和响应。通常,讨论是在没有指导原则的情况下进行的,以促进质量互动。第二个问题涉及等待同学阅读对话,然后仅根据张贴内容编写条目的学生。这个问题说明了质量责任制的必要性,以使所有学生积极参与具有共同责任的协作同伴指导的环境。第三个问题包括妨碍学生发挥其全部潜能的社交行为。由于在线讨论本质上是社交性的,因此有必要在构建在线学术学习社区的背景下检查社交组成部分。全国飞行员包括51名参与者,以测试调查仪器的可靠性,另外两名飞行员和使用三项完整的在线课程进行实际研究。网上班级参与者总计38名学生。所有这三门课程均来自中西部一所小型大学的网页设计课程。合并的教室人口统计信息包括24位在美国各地分布的女学生和14位男学生。学生包括本科前任职教师,保持资格,寻求硕士学位,工业或继续教育。这些学生主要代表各个学科领域的教学设计技术。研究参与者来自三门不同的课程,使用相同的讲师,课程和教科书材料。未来研究的方向包括:(1)完善情感社区,同伴群体,同伴导师和认知准则; (2)完善感知的情感社区,同伴群体,同伴导师和认知调查问题; (3)与使用积极的情感社区,同伴群体,同伴指导和高级认知有关的问题; (4)精致的教学法; (5)改进的基于网络的管理系统,反映了所需的基础教育教学法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Holland, Janet Louise.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Education Technology.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 226 p.
  • 总页数 226
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号