首页> 外文学位 >An exploration of intellectually gifted students' conceptual views of mathematics.
【24h】

An exploration of intellectually gifted students' conceptual views of mathematics.

机译:探索天才学生对数学的概念性看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The study of reflection and reflective thinking has a long history in research on teaching and learning. However, in the assessment of gifted students, quantitative measures are generally utilized these tend to measure only what is observable and discount affective aspects of learning. This study argues that intellectually gifted children, in particular, are not well understood in terms of how they conceptualize or "come to know" mathematics. To explore these phenomena, the researcher applied the portraiture method with three mathematically gifted students in seventh grade. Subjects were selected who had, in the fifth grade, written mathematics autobiographies in which they described their views of mathematics. The study was conducted at the Arrow University Campus Schools (a pseudonym) for intellectually gifted students. Data collection procedures included a review of institutional and student records, a written statement by each subject and his or her parent, and open-ended, semi-structured interviews. Each subject was interviewed three times for l-2 hours each a parent and the student's current mathematics teacher and available former mathematics teachers were interviewed once each for 30-40 minutes. Finally, the researcher observed each student during three mathematics classes. Themes emerged from the various data sources and were triangulated to yield an in-depth portrait of each subject's conceptualization of mathematics. It was found that parents equated potential for adult success to IQ measured at a very young age, and that students enjoyed and were empowered to reflect on their conceptual views of mathematics (Nickson, 2000). Emergent themes appeared to support multidimensional conceptions of giftedness and intelligence. Overall, the research supported McLeod (1992) and Lester's (2000) arguments on the importance of implementing alternative qualitative research tools to uncover students' mathematics beliefs and experiences.
机译:反思和反思性思维的研究在教学研究中有着悠久的历史。但是,在对资优学生的评估中,通常采用定量方法,这些方法往往仅测量可观察到的和对学习有影响的方面。这项研究认为,就他们如何概念化或“认识”数学而言,尤其是智力天赋的孩子并没有得到很好的理解。为了探究这些现象,研究人员将肖像画方法应用到了七年级的三个数学天才学生身上。选择的科目是五年级的书面数学自传,他们在其中描述了他们对数学的看法。这项研究是在箭头大学校园学校(化名)中进行的,这些学校是有才华的学生的。数据收集程序包括对机构和学生记录的审查,每个主题及其父母的书面陈述以及不限成员名额的半结构式访谈。每位家长分别接受两次访谈,每次采访时间为2至2个小时,家长每次要进行1-2次,而学生的现任数学老师和现有的前数学老师则分别接受30-40分钟的访谈。最后,研究人员在三个数学课中观察了每个学生。主题来自各种数据源,并进行了三角剖分,以深入展示每个主题的数学概念。研究发现,父母在很小的时候就可以将成人成功的潜力与智商相提并论,并且学生享受并有权思考他们对数学的概念性看法(Nickson,2000)。新兴主题似乎支持天才和才智的多维概念。总体而言,这项研究支持了麦克劳德(McLeod,1992)和莱斯特(Lester,2000)的论点,即实施替代性定性研究工具对揭示学生的数学信仰和经验的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Goldberg, Sabrina Rainford.;

  • 作者单位

    Teachers College, Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Teachers College, Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Education Mathematics.Education Curriculum and Instruction.Education Special.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 343 p.
  • 总页数 343
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号