【24h】

Performance Comparison of ATM Policing Mechanisms with Telecommunications Traffic

机译:ATM管制机制与电信流量的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) is considered a leading technology for transporting multimedia (including voice, video, and data) over wide area networks. One of the most challenging problems to solve prior to the deploymnet of ATM networks is traffic management and congestion control. ATM can employ traffic policing or usage parameter control (UPC) to monitor and enforce connection's traffic descriptor. When an arriving cell violates its connection's contract, a network policer either discards the "non-conforming" cell or marks it as low priority class cell. This prevents heavily loaded connections from compromising the performance of other connections, and significantly improves the network's ability to predict and guarantee each connection's quality of service. This paper focuses on evaluation and comparison the performance of several traffic policing mechanisms including Leaky Bucket (LB), Jumping Window (JW), Triggering Jumping Window (TJW). Also the proposed mechanism, "Variable Rate Token (VRT)" has been compared by varying the token size and token rate correlating with particular telecommunications traffic.
机译:异步传输模式(ATM)被认为是通过广域网传输多媒体(包括语音,视频和数据)的领先技术。在ATM网络部署之前要解决的最具挑战性的问题之一是流量管理和拥塞控制。 ATM可以采用流量监管或使用参数控制(UPC)来监视和强制执行连接的流量描述符。当到达的信元违反其连接合同时,网络警察将丢弃“不合格”信元或将其标记为低优先级类信元。这样可以防止高负载的连接损害其他连接的性能,并显着提高网络预测和保证每个连接的服务质量的能力。本文着重评估和比较几种流量监管机制的性能,包括泄漏桶(LB),跳跃窗口(JW),触发跳跃窗口(TJW)。还通过改变与特定电信业务相关的令牌大小和令牌速率,比较了所提出的机制“可变速率令牌(VRT)”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号