首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 annual meeting >EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT PATIENT TRANSFER DEVICES IN REDUCING BIOMECHANICAL EXPOSURES AMONG PROFESSIONAL CAREGIVERS
【24h】

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT PATIENT TRANSFER DEVICES IN REDUCING BIOMECHANICAL EXPOSURES AMONG PROFESSIONAL CAREGIVERS

机译:减少专业突发事件中生物力学暴露的不同患者转移设备的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study systematically investigated the efficacy of commercially-available patient transfer devices (a slide sheet, slide board, air-assisted device, and conventional draw sheet) in reducing biomechanical exposures during standardized lateral patient transfer tasks. A repeated-measures laboratory study with 10 experienced caregivers (9 females and 1 male) was conducted to measure the muscle activity in the upper extremity (flexor digitorum superficialis, extensor digitorum communis, biceps, triceps, and trapezius) and low back (erector spinae), and hand pull force and during standardized lateral patient transfer tasks with four different commercially-available transfer devices. The results showed that there were significant differences between the transfer devices in muscle activity (p’s < 0.01) and hand pull force (p < 0.01). The air-assisted device showed the largest reduction of muscle activities and hand pull force. The slide board also showed lower muscle activities and hand full force as compared to the slide sheet and conventional draw sheet; however, limited differences in muscle activity and hand pull force were found between the slide sheet and conventional draw sheet. These findings indicate that the air-assisted device and slide board may be effective engineering controls to reduce the biomechanical exposures and associated injury risks in the upper extremity and low back among caregivers.
机译:这项研究系统地研究了市场上可买到的患者转运设备(滑板,滑板,空气辅助设备和常规牵引纸)在减少标准化的横向病人转运任务期间生物力学暴露方面的功效。进行了一项重复测量的实验室研究,由10位有经验的护理人员(9位女性和1位男性)进行了测量,以测量上肢(指趾屈肌,小指伸肌,肱二头肌,肱三头肌和斜方肌)和下腰(竖脊肌)的肌肉活动),拉力以及在标准化的横向患者转移任务期间,使用四个不同的市售转移设备。结果表明,转移装置在肌肉活动(p <0.01)和拉力(p <0.01)之间存在显着差异。空气辅助装置显示出最大程度的肌肉活动和手拉力下降。与滑板和传统绘图纸相比,滑板还显示出较低的肌肉活动和手的全力;然而,在滑动片和常规拉伸片之间发现的肌肉活动和拉力的差异有限。这些发现表明,空气辅助装置和滑板可能是有效的工程控制措施,可减少看护者上肢和下背部的生物力学暴露和相关的伤害风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号