首页> 外文会议>Pushing Technology Boundaries: Rejuvenating Fields and Skills >A Comparison of Methodologies for Handling Produced Sand and Solids To Achieve Sustainable Hydrocarbon Production
【24h】

A Comparison of Methodologies for Handling Produced Sand and Solids To Achieve Sustainable Hydrocarbon Production

机译:处理产出的沙子和固体以实现可持续碳氢化合物生产的方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

All oil and gas wells produce sand or solids in varying types and amounts. The size and concentration of natural solids (i.e. formation sand) and artificial solids (i.e. workover debris) determine their net effect on production equipment and the resulting management of hydrocarbon production. Conventional exclusion methodology prevents solids from entering the wellbore but may adversely affect inflow production due to skin buildup. Inclusion methodology allows the solids to be produced with well fluids for surface separation and handling. A comparison of the performance, operability, cost impact, and effect on production rate is made for both methods through application examples. The goal is to show that the increased production resulting from allowing solids to be produced in some high sand rate wells allows more sustainable hydrocarbon production with a cost benefit compared to downhole exclusion for certain producing regions.
机译:所有油井和气井都会产生各种类型和数量的沙子或固体。天然固体(即地层砂)和人造固体(即修井残渣)的大小和浓度决定了它们对生产设备的最终影响以及对油气生产的管理。传统的排阻方法可以防止固体进入井眼,但可能会由于表皮堆积而对流入量产生不利影响。夹杂物学方法可使固体与井液一起生产,以进行表面分离和处理。通过应用示例对两种方法的性能,可操作性,成本影响以及对生产率的影响进行了比较。目的是表明与某些产油区排除井下作业相比,允许在一些高含砂率井中生产固体而增加的产量可以实现更具可持续性的烃生产,并具有成本优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号