首页> 外文会议>European Formation Damage Conference >A Comparison of Methodologies for Handling Produced Sand and Solids To Achieve Sustainable Hydrocarbon Production
【24h】

A Comparison of Methodologies for Handling Produced Sand and Solids To Achieve Sustainable Hydrocarbon Production

机译:处理砂和固体处理方法的比较,实现可持续碳氢化合物生产

获取原文

摘要

All oil and gas wells produce sand or solids in varying types and amounts. The size and concentration of natural solids (i.e. formation sand) and artificial solids (i.e. workover debris) determine their net effect on production equipment and the resulting management of hydrocarbon production. Conventional exclusion methodology prevents solids from entering the wellbore but may adversely affect inflow production due to skin buildup. Inclusion methodology allows the solids to be produced with well fluids for surface separation and handling. A comparison of the performance, operability, cost impact, and effect on production rate is made for both methods through application examples. The goal is to show that the increased production resulting from allowing solids to be produced in some high sand rate wells allows more sustainable hydrocarbon production with a cost benefit compared to downhole exclusion for certain producing regions.
机译:所有石油和天然气井都会产生不同类型和量的砂或固体。天然固体的尺寸和浓度(即形成砂)和人工固体(即,工人碎片)确定了对生产设备的净效应和碳氢化合物生产的管理。常规排除方法可防止固体进入井筒,但可能对由于皮肤累积引起的流入产量产生不利影响。包含方法允许用井流体生产用于表面分离和处理的固体。通过应用示例对两种方法进行了性能,可操作性,成本影响和对生产率的影响。目标是表明,由于井下排除的井下排除,允许在一些高砂速井中产生允许在一些高砂速井中产生的固体产生的产生增加的生产增加了较高的生产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号