首页> 外文会议>PODC'10 : Proceedings of the 2010 ACM symposium on principles of distributed computing >Brief Announcement: Queuing or Priority Queuing? On the Design of Cache-Coherence Protocols for Distributed Transactional Memory *
【24h】

Brief Announcement: Queuing or Priority Queuing? On the Design of Cache-Coherence Protocols for Distributed Transactional Memory *

机译:简短公告:排队还是优先排队?关于分布式事务存储的缓存一致性协议的设计*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In distributed transactional memory (TM) systems, both the management and consistency of a distributed transactional object are ensured by a cache-coherence protocol. We formalize two classes of cache-coherence protocols: distributed queuing cache-coherence (DQC) protocols and distributed priority queuing cache-coherence (DPQC) protocols, both of which can be implemented based on a given distributed queuing protocol. We analyze the two classes of protocols for a set of dynamically generated transactions and compare their time complexities against that of an optimal offline clairvoyant algorithm. We show that a DQC protocol Is O(N Log Dδ)-competitive and a DPQC protocol is O(log Dδ)-coinpetitive for a set of N transactions, where Dδ is the normalized maximum communication latency provided by the underlying distributed queuing protocol.
机译:在分布式事务存储器(TM)系统中,分布式事务对象的管理和一致性都是通过缓存一致性协议来确保的。我们将两类高速缓存一致性协议形式化:分布式排队高速缓存一致性(DQC)协议和分布式优先级排队高速缓存一致性(DPQC)协议,这两种协议都可以基于给定的分布式排队协议来实现。我们分析了一组动态生成的事务的两类协议,并将它们的时间复杂度与最佳的离线透视算法的时间复杂度进行了比较。我们显示对于一组N个事务,DQC协议具有O(N LogDδ)竞争性,而DPQC协议具有O(logDδ)竞争性,其中Dδ是底层分布式排队协议提供的标准化最大通信延迟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号