首页> 外文会议>Physiology, Function, and Structure from Medical Images pt.1; Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging; vol.7,no.29 >Effect of Mixing Scanner Types and Reconstruction Kernels on the Characterization of Lung Parenchymal Pathologies: Emphysema, Interstitial Pulmonary Fibrosis and Normal Non-Smokers
【24h】

Effect of Mixing Scanner Types and Reconstruction Kernels on the Characterization of Lung Parenchymal Pathologies: Emphysema, Interstitial Pulmonary Fibrosis and Normal Non-Smokers

机译:混合扫描仪类型和重建核对肺实质病理特征的影响:肺气肿,间质性肺纤维化和正常非吸烟者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study we utilize our texture characterization software (3-D AMFM) to characterize interstitial lung diseases (including emphysema) based on MDCT generated volumetric data using 3-dimensional texture features. We have sought to test whether the scanner and reconstruction filter (kernel) type affect the classification of lung diseases using the 3-D AMFM. We collected MDCT images in three subject groups: emphysema (n=9), interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n=10), and normal non-smokers (n=9). In each group, images were scanned either on a Siemens Sensation 16 or 64-slice scanner, (B50f or B30 recon. kernel) or a Philips 4-slice scanner (B recon. kernel). A total of 1516 volumes of interest (VOIs; 21x21 pixels in plane) were marked by two chest imaging experts using the Iowa Pulmonary Analysis Software Suite (PASS). We calculated 24 volumetric features. Bayesian methods were used for classification. Images from different scanners/kernels were combined in all possible combinations to test how robust the tissue classification was relative to the differences in image characteristics. We used 10-fold cross validation for testing the result. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated. One-way Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) was used to compare the classification result between the various combinations of scanner and reconstruction kernel types. This study yielded a sensitivity of 94%, 91%, 97%, and 93% for emphysema, ground-glass, honeycombing, and normal non-smoker patterns respectively using a mixture of all three subject groups. The specificity for these characterizations was 97%, 99%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. The F test result of ANOVA shows there is no significant difference (p < 0.05) between different combinations of data with respect to scanner and convolution kernel type. Since different MDCT and reconstruction kernel types did not show significant differences in regards to the classification result, this study suggests that the 3-D AMFM can be generally introduced.
机译:在这项研究中,我们利用3D纹理特征基于MDCT生成的体积数据,利用我们的纹理表征软件(3-D AMFM)来表征间质性肺疾病(包括肺气肿)。我们试图使用3-D AMFM测试扫描仪和重建过滤器(内核)的类型是否影响肺部疾病的分类。我们在三个主题组中收集了MDCT图像:肺气肿(n = 9),间质性肺纤维化(IPF)(n = 10)和正常非吸烟者(n = 9)。在每个组中,图像都是在Siemens Sensation 16或64层扫描仪(B50f或B30侦查内核)或Philips 4层扫描仪(B侦查内核)上扫描的。两位胸部成像专家使用爱荷华州肺部分析软件套件(PASS)标记了总共1516份感兴趣的体积(VOI;平面上21x21像素)。我们计算了24个体积特征。贝叶斯方法用于分类。将来自不同扫描仪/内核的图像以所有可能的组合进行组合,以测试组织分类相对于图像特征差异的鲁棒性。我们使用10倍交叉验证来测试结果。计算灵敏度,特异性和准确性。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)来比较扫描仪和重构内核类型的各种组合之间的分类结果。这项研究使用所有三个受试者组的混合物分别对气肿,毛玻璃,蜂窝状和正常非吸烟者产生了94%,91%,97%和93%的敏感性。这些表征的特异性分别为97%,99%,99%和98%。 ANOVA的F测试结果表明,关于扫描仪和卷积核类型,数据的不同组合之间没有显着差异(p <0.05)。由于不同的MDCT和重建内核类型在分类结果方面没有显示显着差异,因此本研究表明可以普遍引入3-D AMFM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号